• TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    27 days ago

    Work ethic never went out of fashion. Many, many people work very hard everyday. Always have. Work is a part of life, always has been, always will be. It’s the incentives that are the problem. Paying people just enough (or not enough, in many cases) to just keep their heads above water, for taking on more and more work, so that owners, investors, and executives can make ever increasing profits, just doesn’t motivate people to work very hard. Much of the hard work in the current system is motivated by fear. That is not positive or sustainable.

    • Norin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      27 days ago

      Hard work feels great when it benefits you, your community, folks you care about, or even just real people.

      It feels fucking awful to work hard when the only people who will benefit are some rich assholes who exploit you.

      • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        It probably won’t make you feel any better, but if you work for a corporation the profits don’t just go to rich assholes. People’s pension plans and retirement funds buy and sell stocks, and so do mutual funds anybody with money can buy. You don’t have to be rich to own stock, just not poor.

    • testfactor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      I agree with you, but this is an “anti work” community, and there’s a substantial part of the movement that is techno-utopian and is actively arguing for the dissolution of work in general.

      • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        I understand, but until the technology necessary for a transcendentalist, post-scarcity, post-work society is developed (assuming said technology is even possible), work will remain absolutely necessary.

        • randomdeadguy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          27 days ago

          Gosh, I hate to disagree with you, but it seems like multi-generation inheritance might affect the necessity of work for some. Currently.

      • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        I’m fairly tech-utopian myself, but it’s is more of an aspirational goal that won’t help anybody for the foreseeable future. Automation will become capable of performing all human labor, but having it actually do that will take a lot longer because it will require reshaping our whole society. It will essentially mean the end of money, and therefore the end of some people being hugely wealthy compared to everybody else, which those people won’t want to let go of.

      • Xerxos@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        There is a real chance that a great change is coming. If most of the problems with AI can be overcome (though that’s far from certain) there will be a change in the job market of dimensions never seen before. A gigantic loss of jobs and a booming market at the same time.

        If that happens and the politicians drop the ball this can be a time of great human suffering and a divide between the rich and the poor worse than ever before.

        On the other hand an implementation of general basic income and social redistribution of wealth could lead to a golden age where working is a choice not a necessity.

        I know which one I would be betting on. I’m not sure if changes to the current system will be even possible without a violent revolution.

  • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    27 days ago

    “Should we promote Bob?”

    “Hell no, he’s the only one here who does any work! We need him right where he is!”

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      27 days ago

      This is not satire.

      It’s called being pigeon holed and that shit is real depending on your company. Some hard workers get promoted some just get more work.

      • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        27 days ago

        Indeed it is not.

        I once worked at the new office of a company that just opened in the state, one of the first who was doing the job while the construction workers were still terminating wires and tacking up drywall. When a new supervisory position was created, all of my coworkers assumed I’d be the first one picked but I was told my experience and wisdom would be better served on the job and teaching new hires the ropes.

        Didn’t take long before I stopped giving a shit about promotions and left for a different company soon after. Telling someone their hard work has been rewarded with more work and not more money for rent is a good way to drain the motivation right out of people you manage.

        • VicVinegar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          26 days ago

          Before I go on, your comment is valid and I fully agree with you. I am not saying this is the case with you, but presenting the other side of the coin. Just because you’re the highest performer at a position does not mean you’re necessarily the best fit for a promotion. I work with plenty of people who were promoted for being the hardest workers. They are now managers who flounder because they cannot work hard to impress. They need to lead a team of hard workers, which requires a different set of traits than being a hard worker yourself. My manager when I started was promoted for being the hardest worker. That was all she knew how to do. She could not lead people. Couldn’t give constructive criticism, could not take constructive criticism. Any idea that was not her idea was not a good idea. Wanted to rule with an iron fist and feel important, but could not do anything that would actually get her there. Extremely hard worker though, and the work she did do was on point. Just could not lead a team. It’s shitty, but it’s the truth.

          • RamenJunkie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            26 days ago

            It may also be that someone does not WANT to be promoted. I get high praise from higher ups, everyone iny group comes to me for suggestions and advice.

            I am, pretty low on the totem pole. I have no desire to move up to a position where Inspend more time making spreadsheets into lies tomplease upper management than doing actual tangible work. Plus the company seems like its always fucking over managers randomly the higher you go. Feels more secure down here.

            • VicVinegar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              26 days ago

              Don’t hate on yourself for not wanting to move up. Your job is valuable, or people wouldn’t give you money to do it. If you’re asking me, there’s a certain respect you have to give people who prioritize their happiness over money or status. It’s the opposite of greed, which I find commendable. What’s the point of money if you’re not happy enough to enjoy it?

              You may one day find yourself in a company or position where you do want to move up. But for now there’s no shame in being content.

          • booly@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            26 days ago

            Hall of fame tier athletes often struggle as coaches after their playing careers are over, in large part because they don’t necessarily know how to coach people who don’t have the same level of talent/skill/physical gifts/hustle they do.

        • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          26 days ago

          Totally worth it. You get the real raises from new jobs. If you were so irreplaceable, then they’d pay you for it.

          Never accept a counter offer. They’ll just keep you on long enough to find any replacement. The counter offer is just so they lose less money over the next few months.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    26 days ago

    Having a work ethic is a fine thing. Just don’t let sleazy employers take advantage of it, because you’ll get nothing in return.

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    27 days ago

    I’ve learned to be the one to turn the lights off. It pisses the boss off but ensures everyone knows the shift is over

  • ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    26 days ago

    the only people who want to put in longer hours at the office have absolutely nothing to go home to.

    they should be pitied instead of being vilified. drop them a “get well soon” message in social media should you encounter them.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    If I saw one of my employees being the first one in the office turning on the lights as well as the last one turning them off, I’d see that as a problem.

    I’d talk to that worker and first ask why they were doing this as I’d be concerned that they may be having trouble at home (and were using work as an escape). I’d want to find out if there was anything they needed to help their home situation. When you manage people, their home problems become your problems. The corollary to this is that a solution for a personal home problem can become a solution to a workplace problem. I had one worker that had difficulty at work because they didn’t have working laundry facilities which affected them wearing presentable clothing at work. I bought them a new laundry appliance for $500 and had it delivered. After that they were always dressed presentably at work. This was a very good worker otherwise, and this fixed the work problem as well as helped them at home in their personal life.

    If they communicated they believed the “first in, last out” was their understanding of the work expectation, I’d correct them on that immediately. One of my favorite phrases to use at work are “There are days I might have to ask you to stay later. This is not that day. There’s nothing urgent that can’t wait for tomorrow. Go home early.” (these are salary folks, so they’re not losing money by leaving early).

    If they communicated they were overworked, I’d work with them on the tasks to make sure they were only getting assigned a reasonable workload. This may mean hiring another worker, or eliminating tasks that don’t produce a meaningful result to the company to make sure the workload would be reasonable.

    Requiring your workers to be “butts in seats” (mine are WFH anyway) simply to be tick a box is the fastest way to lose your best people as it is disrespectful of their skills and their effort. Further, well rested workers (mentally and physically) perform far better than exhausted and stressed ones.

  • Let's Go 2 the Mall!@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    27 days ago

    I turn the lights on in the morning and make coffee. Because I’m the only one that knows how to make coffee that doesn’t taste like dirty water. Has nothing to do with work ethic and everything to do with coffee.

      • Look, I appreciate op’s point and your point, but let’s not pretend that coffee is anything other than dirt water. In my experience, you’ve got the correct recipe. Easy.

        But if you cook the dirt water for too long, the dirt gets a bad flavor.

  • cultsuperstar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    27 days ago

    Hahahaha talk about corporate propaganda. I feel sorry for the poor schlub that reads this and is like “yeah, I’m gonna do that”.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      It is, unironically, good advice for new hires because it signals enthusiasm and work ethic. Getting in early let’s you talk to people before they’re swamped. Coffee room chatter is a good way to meet people and build relationships. Beating the traffic means less stress through your day.

      But once you start having a real life, this doesn’t work. Dogs need walks. Kids come first. You’re not a 20 year old with lots of free time anymore, so you can’t indulge your boss with the fantasy that you exist exclusively for the benefit of the firm.

  • Rooty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    27 days ago

    So if the same person is opening and closing, what is everyone else doing? If you’re going to saddle one employee with an important duty, you better have adequate compensation and opportunities.

  • TOModera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    27 days ago

    Gus Catlson: US based company consultant who writes for right based Canadian newspaper Globe & Mail. Also was a director at that newspaper. Was in charge of communications for the Thompson Reuters merger. Has a Pulitzer from 1992, but beyond that its all business reporting and opinion pieces.

    Everything in his background tells me he hasn’t had to work insane hours in decades. He hasn’t had a boss ask him to work 10 - 20 extra hours just to have a 2% increase at the end of the year. He was in charge of a Canadian major newspaper, which aren’t known for paying a proper wage. So he knows he’s lying, he’s just annoyed people want to have lives.

      • nepenthes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        26 days ago

        Globe and Mail is a sensationalist rag with no ethics. They put footage online of a fourteen year old girl being stabbed to death in a school before the cops made them take it down. Don’t give them clicks.

    • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      Bill Carroll from CFRA (talk radio) is constantly going on about how we need to get people back to the office 5 days a week to save downtown businesses.

      He broadcasts from his home well outside the city.

      Canada’s rightoids and libs have a long history of being incredibly hypocritical.

      • TOModera@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        26 days ago

        Yeah, its troll shit so managers repeat it and then we all suffer. I wish someone would force them to go through it, but they’d probably learn nothing in the end.

  • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    27 days ago

    I managed an auto parts warehouse with a small fleet of delivery drivers, I was the one with the code to the alarm and they keys to everything. Sometimes if I had trouble sleeping or was a bit hungover from imbibing too much I’d sleep in and roll up to the shop around 9-10 instead of 7. Not a single one of my employees ever had an issue with starting the day later and I didn’t care about them leaving early to pick up kids or whatever. Long as you show up and shit gets done I’m putting the same hours on all your paychecks anyways

    • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      27 days ago

      We work a lot of hard, long hours in my field. Occasionally I get a fuck off easy job but that’s only when business is slow. I’m the lead tech on every job. I also have a bad problem waking up in the morning. Despite being fully sober and getting at least 7 hours of sleep, I sleep through my alarms which are incredibly loud and annoying, and they’re set 5 minutes apart for two hours. Guys who know me know that they can go in, do their work, and if I’m late I let them go early by the amount of time I am late. I’m often finishing the job by myself at night.

      That’s ok though. That’s the way the world should work. I’m not a morning person. Waking up is literally the worst thing that happens to me every day barring tragedies or serious injuries. It’s so much worse in the winter too.

      • Narauko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        27 days ago

        I would rather sustain the injuries than to wake up half the time, regardless of how much or little sleep I’ve gotten. I feel your pain. Genetic night watchmen unite! Whichever morning person decided the world should exist 9-5 should be dragged into the street and shot.

      • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        26 days ago

        I once took a programming / analyst job specifically because it was at least partially a night shift. I had to be free to work alongside a team on the other side of the planet for a few hours a day. Best job I ever had, I’d still be doing it if they hadn’t run out of projects for us to do.

        I can stay up all night if you need me to, but fuck waking up early.