• caseofthematts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    192
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m just going to post this comment to this thread as well, since this is newer. Classic shifting of blame and no one taking responsibility for scummy actions.

    Fun fact: Funko’s current CEO is the ex-president of Wizards of the Coast!

    Why is this relevant? Well, under her leadership, WotC sent pinkerton agents to someone’s home to threaten them because they got some Magic the Gathering cards early. She said things like Dungeons & Dragons players were under-monetised, pushing to make the Table Top game more like a microtransaction-filled video game, and helped with the OGL scandal.

    The OGL, for anyone unfamiliar, was an Open Gaming License WotC had for years with D&D 3rd party creators. It allowed certain things to be created using D&D mechanics and lore by anyone that followed its guidelines and allowances. A couple years ago, WotC tried to change that so they would make more money off of people trying to create things for D&D - to profit off of indie creators passionate about the game. There was a huge backlash, and they eventually went back on this decision.

    All this to say, you can see what kind of leader the current Funko CEO is, and what’s happening with itch isn’t surprising to me.

    • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      We need to compile a list of shitty executives for boycotting purposes. No more “this company did a bad thing”. No. We need exactly this, with “this is David Davidson, who led the enshittification of ABC, Inc”

      It needs to be a document, a wiki, of exactly the shitty things those people did so that businesses will have monetary reasons to want to avoid shitty executives.

      Let’s help those poor, poor companies from being victimized by those awful greedy people. The poor things.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fuck all the corpo fucks involved here with their plausible deniability attempt. If you truly felt any remorse, you’d talk about how you’ll disengage this AI chum service, or demand that requests are extremely precise or hyper targeted at specific direct issues. This story of blanket action helps the big company with monkey and always hurts the little guy that gets swept up in their ravenous wake.

    Also, educate the next month of your online presence you boosting the brand you wronged with your reach. But you won’t do shit, you aren’t remorseful.

    • Adalast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Personally I want to see the criminal shield removed for corporations. All C-Level executives become personally liable for any illegal actions, malfeasance, slander/liable, or injurious action perpetrated or instigated by the company with the ONLY defense being proving, beyond a shadow of a doubt (not just reasonable doubt) that an actor within or without the company caused the action with the express intent of harming the C-Level executives, either specific or generally.

      Fuck corporate personhood. Fuck people making a LLC and doing whatever the fuck they want under the guise of the company then the company declares bankruptcy while they run off like a cartoon character with bags of money. Leadership liability and culpability should be the norm, not the exception.

      • ricdeh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Aren’t C-Suite already liable for illegal actions? I know for sure that it’s that way in Germany, and I cannot imagine it to be different in the U.S.

        • Adalast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nope, they are covered most of the time by what is known as the “corporate veil”.

          Better explained than I can do here: https://federal-lawyer.com/when-can-a-ceo-be-held-personally-liable/

          Essentially, unless they are personally doing it, they are protected. Embezzle millions and you go to jail, poison a water supply, kill thousands, give birth defects, cancer, and a myriad of other health issues to a community at large and only the corporation is liable/culpable.

  • Obinice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fuck Funko and fuck their shitty CEO.

    Not worth thinking about any further. I wish itch.io the best in their lawsuit.

  • Sixty@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    We HoLd A dEeP ReSpEcT…

    Yeah hiring AI slop to take down websites with zero humanity oversight screams “respect.”

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Translation

    OhShitOhShitOhShitOhShitOhShitOhShitTheAIReallyFuckedUpPleaseDontSueUsOhShitOhShitOhShitOhShit

  • JTskulk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Brand protection partners is a much friendlier way to say bloodsucking lawyers.

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    AI to determine people’s livelihoods, huh?

    By the way, who’s the Brandshield CEO? Asking for a friend.

  • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    How much you want to bet that response was AI generated?

    Seriously, the way it explains things and the repetition reek of ChatGPT