“We are raising funds to support a critical legal defense in the fight against unchecked corporate power and a system that continues to favor the few over everyone else. This case isn’t just about one individual—it’s about challenging a status quo that protects the interest of the powerful at the expense of justice and fairness,” read one of the fundraising pages that was quickly removed by GoFundMe.

  • pjwestin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    1 year ago

    During the Great Depression, people were so angry at banks that they rooted for bank robbers. Things are so bad now that we’re just straight up rooting for cold-blooded executions. Censoring people’s online activities won’t make this anger go away. The genies out of the bottle now, and if billionaires don’t want any more dead CEOs, there will need to be fundamental, radical changes to our society.

    • CallateCoyote@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Reddit just banned me for saying I support Luigi in his monster slaying quest and hope there’s more heroes out there.

      Say, what’s the Lemmy policy on being real? I don’t really care. I’ll say it in person as well as any online platform, and if I’m banned from them all then I’ll just read books and shit.

    • Hiro8811@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Like that’s ever gonna happen. There are and will always be boot lickers that’ll do anything for money.

      • pjwestin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        More like how FDR used the banks’ need for government assistance to force regulation on them through the 1933 Banking Act and the Glass-Steagall Act.

          • pjwestin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes. A decade after it was repealed, we had the largest financial collapse since it was enacted, and now we’re dealing with higher income inequality than we had during the Gilded Age. What part of this is meant to invalidate my point?

            • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I’m refuting the idea that fanservice leads to lasting institutional change.

              The fact that we’re in the shitter because the change didn’t stick kinda proves my point.

              • pjwestin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Well, A) the point isn’t that, “fan service,” created this change. It’s that people’s willingness to side with outlaws over institutions is a good barometer of public anger, and based on the United Healthcare killing, people are fucking pissed. B) FDR passed banking reform and social welfare programs that created decades of economic stability and only lost their efficacy after half a century of conservative attacks chipped away at them. I’m not sure why you think a historical example of the sort of fundamental, radical change in talking about doesn’t count just because the Baby Boomers fucked it all up.

          • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yes, proof that reforming capitalism is wasted effort. You can only delay end stage capitalism reforms, not prevent it.