• Shardikprime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 minutes ago

      Literally

      My desktop/laptop experience for both is as follows:

      Windows update, at least since the inception of the concept has never required me to go to a browser (unless you count w98 “everything is a website” concept for the desktop or the far in between instances were a PC was offline/having issues and you need to download update packages)

      It also updated windows applications (ie office) but yeah it never intended to upgrade other stuff, all other software had their own auto update check

      I’ll concede the restart because yeah it does all for that

      But yeah Linux install is not without issues, and I’ll just remind everyone of how difficult it was/is to install a component driver when it’s not automatically found (wifi cards, disk controllers, and Realtek drivers anyone?)

      Yeah it does update your apps, as long as you have the repos, and restart wise I distinctively remember that you do need to do restarts after updates, be it major distro or not.

      Simple commands? I’ll concede that, as long as we remember the average Linux user is used to a less user friendly experience. Complain ask you want but for the average user, windows update experience works

      Thankfully I don’t need to deal with all that stuff now

  • PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I don’t know about all the arguing and snark, but… I’ve been using Ubuntu (laugh it up) on my work laptop for the last 3ish years, and the vast majority of the time it really is “click install updates. wait 2 minutes. ok every program on your computer is up to date, just don’t forget to restart Firefox”. Can’t think of a time where updating sucked. Sometimes I even go through the terminal just because it makes me feel cool to be a hackerman.

    I dread updating my windows pc at home. Cuts into my WoW time too much.

    • PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Coincidentally my windows PC needed to update when I got back to it. It took like 15 minutes and 2 restarts. I legit pulled out my Ubuntu laptop and Sudo apt-get upgraded that bitch just to flex on Bill Gates.

      • GladiusB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I mean they are. I game constantly and use a Linux only machine. The only games that don’t work are crappy anti cheat games from Epic. And they are crappy. So who cares?

        I duel booted just for those and it wasn’t worth the headache. Linux is far superior in every way.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        They are. I have about the same success rate with Proton and WINE(via Heroic Launcher) as to when I still duel booted Windows. If you’re talking about games with rootkit anticheats, I never played those in Windows anyway.

          • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            I just use Mint. Just think of Proton as a feature of Steam. I just pick a game from my Steam library and select Force Compatibility mode on and install. Heroic Launcher (for GoG and some other things) is a few more steps, but I didn’t need a guide to figure it out. Heroic lets you choose either Proton or WINE, so I installed Steam first to minimize confusion.

            Oh, and another nice feature of Heroic is that it will grab the Linux binary if it’s available somewhere even if that binary isn’t available on GoG. I was surprised that it grabbed the native client for Factorio instead of the windows version that’s on GoG.

              • rtxn@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 hours ago

                The overhead added by Proton, compared to the CPU time consumed by the actual game, is minimal. The greatest benefit is that you don’t have dozens of Windows services hogging half of your memory and CPU.

                Some games have some quirks that can cause performance issues when running under Proton. Deathloop, for example, was good on Windows, but unplayable on Linux with the same hardware (Ryzen 5 2600, 16G RAM, RX 6750 XT). There was massive stuttering even on minimum graphics, and every level took several minutes to load. It works now, but since then I’ve upgraded to a 7800X3D, so I’m probably just brute-forcing my way through the same issues.

              • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                Probably, but I’m already running ancient hardware and I tend to favor retro and indie games, so I’m not the best to ask about that. Some people do report better performance under Proton though. Windows has a lot of bloat that doesn’t exist with WINE/Proton running in Linux.

              • TheSalarian@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 hours ago

                That completely depends on the game. Many play just as well if not better, some play worse or not at all. Check out a site called ProtonDB for a huge list of games and their level of playability.

      • Tin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Most games on Steam work just fine when you turn on Proton. Gaming on linux has come a long way.

  • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    No restart require on Linux is a joke, right? Because I get updates that require restarts as often as I get them on Windows when updating Mint.

    • Camille@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Unless you’re updating the kernel itself, there is little chance you actually need to reboot your machine. Just restarting whatever service or application you’re using should do the trick.

        • Camille@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          You do you, it can’t hurt to reboot and work on a fresh restart. But if for some reasons you need to keep your machine up, you’ll know it is less of a problem than on windows typically

    • Blueteabag@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Really? I need to restart my Windows less often, Fedora asks me every other day restart my PC to install updates

        • Blueteabag@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          “Issue” implies that there is something wrong with it it’s simple a different release model, Fedora just got the newer packages, for example Gnome 43 on Debian vs Gnome 47 on Fedora (obviously I’m talking about the stable releases). If you prefer the Debian way of doing things that’s great but I don’t.

  • hinterlufer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    somepackage requires otherpackage version >10.1.79

    otherpackage is already at latest version

    Have fun compiling it yourself and messing up what is managed by the package manager and what’s not. And don’t forget that the update might break some other package along the way

    • TunaCowboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Most of the time you can just download a release and place the binary in path (or a symlink).

      Compiling it yourself should not ‘messing up’ anything, it should build locally:

      ./configure
      make -j$(nproc)
      

      Now it’s just built, nothing on your system has changed. make install will place requisite files where they need to go, but this generally configurable via prefix or equivalent. You may need to install dependencies, but that’s usually a simple exercise in reading the output from the configuration step.

      Compiling software is easy as fuck and is incredibly flexible.

  • BatrickPateman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Windows side of things is getting better though, thanks to winget. Not perfect and it f’s up with certain packages but already a lot better than updating by hand.

  • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    8 hours ago

    You people always come off as old people on infomercials.

    Anyways Linus desktop is a mess. You are delusional if you think it’s easier. Maybe more efficient workflows for certain things but easier is a lol.