Stacey Williams says the ex-president, whose spokesperson denied the allegations, touched her in an unwanted sexual way in 1993, after Epstein introduced them.

  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    People that talk this way about women are often, in my experience, the same ones who immediately fellate the first director, VP, or C-suite asshole they stumble across.

    • Adm_Drummer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      27 days ago

      Well yeah. But to them that isn’t “Shaking their tits” it’s “Rubbing elbows with the social elite to climb the corporate ladder.”

      Selling your soul is still selling your soul. Doesn’t matter if it’s to the devil or their lieutenants.

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        The more I think about it the more I think a lot of the vitriol comes from them being jealous that they can’t just “shake their tits” and have to instead brown nose people.

        • Adm_Drummer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          27 days ago

          In my experience that’s exactly it. They’re the same kinds of people who also say “You know, if I was an attractive young girl I would love to make money staying home and showing my tits on the internet for money.” But when confronted with the reality of it all they would rather demean people who actually do that and make more money than them.

          The fact is a lot of them are threatened by women who make more money than them while also feeling like those women owe them something for being attractive. Like I said, these people do “shake their tits for the rich.” In one way or the other. It’s only that the people who are actually shaking their tits are the honest ones while the bootlickers cry for the boot to stomp down harder.