I’m just a regular person making about $70K a year in a big city, and I’ve recently felt incredibly powerless dealing with private companies. For instance, my landlord’s auto-pay system had a glitch that excluded my pet rent and water bill. I ended up with over $1,000 in late fees. Despite hours on the phone, it turns out their system doesn’t really do auto-pay and requires a fixed amount instead of covering the full rent. It feels like a scam, and my options are to pay the fees or potentially spend a fortune on legal action.

Another frustrating experience was trying to cancel my pest control service. I had to endure a 40-minute call followed by 35 minutes of arguing, just to finally cancel. There’s no online cancellation option, and the process felt like a timeshare sales pitch.

Why do ordinary people seem so unprotected against these shady practices, and how can we change this? How does one person even start to address these issues?

  • Boozilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    The country was founded by slave owners. After that we had various “industry barons” like railroads, petroleum, automobiles, etc. Now we have multinational corporations (with larger budgets and more power than several countries) calling the shots in congress. It’s always been like this. Post-WWII provided a brief respite, but that limited run of the “American Dream” was temporary and no longer exists.

    Part of the solution would be: worker cooperatives. We need a lot more of those. It won’t solve everything, but it’s a really good start.

    • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      We need a kind of everybody union.

      I had this conversation with lots of people if everyone saw a company is doing things or taking advantage of people imagine if on the exact same day, one million customers canceled their accounts. That kind of unity can give all the power needed to the regular people. But you can’t get people to cooperate or even to have enough self-discipline to go along with something that isn’t for their immediate and measurable benefit. And so the big players know they can abuse and exploit.

        • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          U.S.A. is not a democracy, it’s an oligarchy. Has been for decades, but more so now than ever before. Corporations have begun to openly ignore law and have no fear of punishment. Because they own the government they write the laws and they decide what happens everywhere.

          As I said in a different comment, it’s a painful thing to hear, but the sad simple truth is, the bad guys won.

      • Boozilla@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I have had this same thought many times! Vote with our wallets en masse. It’s kind of almost happening to fast food.

      • trolololol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        In Australia ACCC takes care of abusive businesses, surely there must be something like that? Even 3rd world countries like Brazil has something like it.

        • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Nope. America is OWNED by rich people. It’s a corporation and they make the laws so all the laws are to help them have more power.

          • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I wouldn’t see it so black-and-white. I don’t think Tim Walz is owned by anyone and he is running for VP.

            • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              He’s beholden to the corporations controlled by the wealthiest 1%. Anyone who gets elected is already someone who “plays ball” because they don’t get to there otherwise.

              • trolololol@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                Ha you don’t even get to run without people in line to donate to you. And since corp donates for both candidates it’s a win or win situation for them, which implies lose or lose for everyone.

                • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  It would be nice if corporate bribery were not allowed. Giving tens of millions to them - to their “campaign” - which they all funnel and launder into their pockets - is literal and unambiguous bribery. And yet it’s the reality of our nation.

        • Landless2029@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          We have the Federal Trade Comission but it needs to have the balls to really protect us.

          Even when they step up its usually a small fine the offender just writes off as the cost of doing business.

          Corp breaks a law. Makes $100m profit. Gets $10m fine. All good for the books!!

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      The country was founded by slave owners.

      Thanks for starting your argument with this, so I know I can ignore the rest.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Basically we got all our rights in the post war period. Baby boomers and their parents had an excellent time, got theirs, then pulled up the ladder behind them. Zoomers will probably fix this but it’ll be interesting to see if it sticks this time.

  • lordnikon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    it’s because money equals power and they have all the money and are able to build mechanisms to suck the money you have so that they have even more money. Can’t help with the landlord but for the pest control using something like virtual credit cards numbers. so if they won’t let you cancel. you just delete that card and they lose acess to your payment details. when they contact you for payment just cancel right then.

    • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s the only thing we will have left pretty soon. Capitalism is pretty close to flatlining. Then we will have a Corporate Congress and the nation will become The United Corporation of America - in name as opposed to now where that’s what it is but it’s not yet called that.

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I do anticipate fascism becoming overt after November, but the powers that be will market it well, like that time they turned Nazism into ‘White Nationalism’.

  • How_do_I_computah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Good question and good examples. With things like forced arbitration in user agreements I’d love to know more on how to turn things around on this.

    • Buttflapper@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I spoke to a lawyer about something similar to this recently and he basically just laughed at me. Told me there is no way it’s worth it, would cost tens of thousands of dollars to fight it in court and would basically have no gain to me personally at all. Overturning such a small amount no matter how wrong or immoral it is would be extremely costly on both sides but they have way more money to throw at the issue than I do which I totally agree with honestly. So you can do something that’s totally immoral, just as long as you have tons of money behind you to pay for it

    • pezmaker @sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It’s exactly what it sounds like. Extra bullshit monthly rent tacked onto the regular rent in addition to a usually non-refundable pet deposit at time of move in or pet adoption.

      Basically you’re a money faucet in the US, and wide open if you have pets or kids

      • MissJinx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Wait, Kids too?!! omg

        I get the deposit, pets can be destructive, but pet rent is peak captalism. It’s like charging rent by the weight!

        thank god I don’t have that here coz I have 2 dogs and 2 cats.

        So that applies to any pet? Even hamsters and fish?

        • pezmaker @sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          To be clear, rent is usually one value for however many humans will be living there, but everywhere has different rules for pets. For the most part you’re restricted to one or two dogs specifically if they’re allowed at all. Some places will charge the same for one or more, some will charge more for 2. It’s really variable. But with RealPage leading the way with the largest rental management companies, is getting pretty unified and difficult to not get fucked over by.

          Smaller pets like fish or hamsters usually aren’t mentioned or charged for though that I’ve seen.

  • UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    One of the things more and more companies are doing is

    Ignoring the Laws.

    They have learned to ignore what they are required to do or what they are allowed to do . Knowing few will sue and those who win will get no more than they were due.

    The companies have learned there is no downside for being criminal… So they have become criminals.

  • Gordito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I finally was able to cancel a Telus home security service after they tried to put me in a 3 yr contract. I finally was able to cancel. I sent the equipment back and then they started charging me other monthly fees as if I had renewed. I didn’t even have their equipment anymore.

    another 45 minutes on the phone and they say it is finally cancelled. But who knows. I’ll probably have to call again when they take the amount from my bank account despite removing my bank info from their site.

    A company with 19.2M users. Imagine how many people are robbed “by mistake.” This is not a mistake but part of their internal procedures.

    Cancelling a service even when contract is over is made difficult on purpose.

  • heavyboots@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Pretty much we are a corporate welfare state at this point. Electing officials you think will pass or enforce laws to bring them to heel is your best bet. (People like AOC are preferred, as she has never accepted contributions from corporations to her campaign.)

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Vote. Seriously. Recent history around consumer protection has been very partisan and this is something that impacts us all

    One party creates things like

    • cfpb
    • net neutrality
    • ACA
    • education assistance

    The other party. Cancels, sues, interrupts. Project 2025 probably tries to entirely destroy

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      One party creates things like cfpb

      Putting warning labels on predatory lending. Spending more time fighting various right-wing interests in the right-wing dominated courts than doing any actual regulating. Does nothing to deliver actual money to the people who need it - all they can do is regulate the extent to which a private loan is shitty and extortionary.

      net neutrality

      Tries to regulate the ISP monopoly rather than breaking it up. Doesn’t actually guarantee internet access to anyone. Doesn’t extend high speed internet or establish public internet access points. Also constantly under fire in the right-wing dominated courts, such that they can’t effectively deliver on their function.

      ACA

      The best thing about the ACA is the extension of who qualifies for Medicaid. Everything else is a band-aid on a band-aid. Just open up Medicaid as the Public Option and you’d have done more good for more people in the long run.

      education assistance

      Doesn’t limit the total cost of education. Can’t even extend loans at the Prime Rate, because some private middle man always needs to get a cut. Doesn’t improve access to education by setting up new public schools or vocational programs. Doesn’t increase teacher pay, reduce student housing costs, or mitigate the cost of living while pursuing an education.

      Blah blah, the Republicans Are Worse. But the Democrats only ever seem capable of operating through the private sector via subsidies and civil penalties. Where is the actual public infrastructure? What does the public sector actually own and operate? What is being delivered at cost rather than as a profit-center for a third party?

      • Buttflapper@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        All of these are really important policy changes that have positively impacted our society. How do you spark change to the effect of all these? I recently reached out to the Federal trade commission on one company that has some extremely predatory practices but don’t think that’ll do anything. What other methods can I use? Email congressman or something?

      • faltryka@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I once got screwed by my mortgage provider and was helpless. I submitted a complaint to the CFPB and they contacted my mortgage provider and made them make things right. That directly translated to significant money back in my pocket.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I once got screwed by my mortgage provider

          This is the root of the problem. You shouldn’t need to borrow money from a private third party in order to purchase a home.

      • SoJB@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        And for the cherry on top, the party in the 2-party system that claims to be the “good” side trying to implement all these citizen-friendly policies have enjoyed multiple majorities in the last 40 years that would have allowed them to do these with the snap of a finger using well documented legal mechanisms.

        And yet, they do not.

        That liberal sneer about leftists just wanting to complain rather than fix things? Also projection.

        Really weird how everywhere I turn, the “good” side is doing the same fucking thing as the bad orange side.

  • BlucifersVeinyAnus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    In a nutshell: average Americans don’t have extra billions of dollars laying around to lobby against corporations writing laws so lawmakers don’t have to be bothered with it

  • Caveman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    The US is incredibly bad at reining in capitalism. It also only has two parties that are both heavily influenced by lobbyists.

    To fix it, not sure, calling politicians and showing up to stuff will help but it’s always going to be an uphill battle. Anyway, just vote, if you get the option to choose then vote for a third party as long as you’re not in a swing state.

    The real solution is still voting reform to get more diverse opinion so if that’s on the ballot vote for it and try to get other people to do the same. The UK missed a major opportunity for voter reform.

    This can happen over a couple of generations by removing winner take all representatives for a state and cause a hung parliament. Coalition talks will then be more likely to include concessions on the two state systems to get a governing coalition.

    You can look at the UK as being the same only one generation ahead if things go well.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It also only has two parties that are both heavily influenced by lobbyists.

      And yet, one party keeps enacting consumer and worker protection laws, with the other party taking them away. HMMM CURIOUS oh well I’m sure they’re both equally bad

      • Caveman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah, Democrats are way better at making legislation that benefits an average person. They’re also respect the parliamentary conventions and the democratic process.

    • Landless2029@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I agree with one correction.

      Vote even in non swing states.

      There are far too many registered voters who don’t vote.

      Texas could be blue every year if half the dem no shows just voted.

      Also even less vote outside of the presidential election.

    • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yes, IMO when there is more competition, politicians start caring about the little things besides the big things like inflation.