• MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    After breaking on my notebook for the umpteenth time, i try now void. Have to fix some of my automation scripts tho.

  • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I tried arch once. Eventually, my computer just showed a black screen on booting. I managed to fix it by resetting my bios. That was the end of that attempt at using arch. Still want to try again, though.

    • Lulzagna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I had this happen once or twice, caused by bad Nvidia drivers with Wayland.

      I use AMD now for my day job, haven’t had a single issue in over two years. That’s not to say you should use it - it’s still a rolling release distro and will always have a potential to break over most other distros.

  • Samsy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I used arch over 5 years in the past. Isn’t it common today checking the update news on the arch wiki before updating?

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    aaaand thats why i like “newbie” distros like ubuntu mint fedora and such.

    i want my computer to work without a hitch and without having to maintain the OS.

    • icedterminal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s always been bad practice to just blindly update software. That’s why we have different distros.

      Ubuntu and Mint hold your hand and make it easy for newcomers. Great way to dive into Linux. I completely agree these are great for “it just works” and no fuss. I’ve not had one break on me.

      Arch and Gentoo expect you to have experience and know what you’re doing. You build it up how you want it. That’s what makes these so great. But you need the experience and knowledge.

      I’ve personally tried openSUSE and in my opinion it feels like a good middle ground between both ends. In the past I’ve recommended Mint to get started, openSUSE once you’ve got experience, and then Arch for when you want total control.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      And I like having my software up-to-date. It sucked ass when I was on Mint and one of my favorite programs had an update and I had to wait months for it to hit the repos.

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        this is why i switched from elementary. really good distro, but its based on ubuntu lts. think years instead of months. big oof.

  • Psythik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Never seen the third LotR film; I was literally about to finally watch it today so thanks for spoiling the movie for me.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s not the kernel but always mkinit in my case, on multiple machines. Even if i did never do nothing related. And booster/dracut and Efistub somehow never worked.

    • DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      The moment I finally installed Arch was then I felt “freedom” for the first time. No longer do I need to make compromises on my system and have things installed that I don’t need or want. It’s my system that I put together the way I like it. A bonus is that I know my system pretty well if something should break and I have the wiki to guide me