Wikipedia has a new initiative called WikiProject AI Cleanup. It is a task force of volunteers currently combing through Wikipedia articles, editing or removing false information that appears to have been posted by people using generative AI.

Ilyas Lebleu, a founding member of the cleanup crew, told 404 Media that the crisis began when Wikipedia editors and users began seeing passages that were unmistakably written by a chatbot of some kind.

  • sbv@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    1 month ago

    As for why this is happening, the cleanup crew thinks there are three primary reasons.

    “[The] main reasons that motivate editors to add AI-generated content: self-promotion, deliberate hoaxing, and being misinformed into thinking that the generated content is accurate and constructive,”

    That last one. Ouch.

    • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Well, I was in doubt, so I asked the AI whether I could trust the answers and it told me not to worry about it. That must mean that I only get accurate answers, right? /s

  • randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 month ago

    If anyone can survive the AI text apocalypse, it is wikipedia. They have been fending off and regulating article writing bots since someone coded up a US town article writer from the 2000 census (not the 2010 or 2020 census, the 2000 census. This bot was writing wikipedia articles in 2003)

    • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 month ago

      They used to be contained, every village has their idiot. Now that the internet is the global village, all the formerly isolated idiots have a place to chat.

  • nutsack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 month ago

    why the fuck would anyone stick ai shit on wikipedia that doesn’t make any sense

    • NateNate60@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 month ago

      “[The] main reasons that motivate editors to add AI-generated content: self-promotion, deliberate hoaxing, and being misinformed into thinking that the generated content is accurate and constructive,” Lebleu said.

    • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      The irony being a huge amount of the llm knowledge was based on WP in the first place, that and scientific papers.

  • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Require someone that wants to add stuff to pay a small amount to the Wikimedia Foundation for activating their account and refund it if they moderate a certain amount.

    • aubertlone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah I mean I’ve had minor edits reversed because I didn’t source the fact properly

      And that was like 10 years ago I’m surprised these edits are getting through in the first place