This is a job for Kristi Noem.

  • mycodesucks@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    I mean, the amount of time the US takes is an outlier. Most countries announce and have elections in a shorter time span than 2 months, and if it’s a proportional government, sometimes you don’t find out the leader until AFTER the election.

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Things being worse don’t make that good, though. Whatever, I’m not going to change world politics over here but I still think it’s all kinda fucked.

      • BottleOfAlkahest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        A lot of people would consider that good…not worse. Like the UK has a cap on the amount of money and time that some campaigns can be. That allows candidates who aren’t flooded with money to have more of a chance at actually being elected. It helps make the formation of a two party system run by the Koch brothers less likely…

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        As an American, that doesn’t sound worse. It sounds wonderful. A two month campaign means that we could focus on something else for the rest of many, if not most, years.

        Also would make it just a tiny bit more difficult for big money to be able to influence the election as easily.

        Hell, gimme a 1 month campaign season with two weeks of preview, for the candidates to declare their candidacy before the month of campaigns. I have enough time in 1 month to research the available candidates, make my decision, and mail my ballot back to Sacramento.