Julian Lewis didn’t pull over for the Georgia State Patrol cruiser flashing its blue lights behind him on a rural highway. He still didn’t stop after pointing a hand out the window and turning onto a darkened dirt road as the trooper sounded his siren.

Five minutes into a pursuit that began over a broken taillight, the 60-year-old Black man was dead — shot in the forehead by the white trooper who fired a single bullet mere seconds after forcing Lewis to crash into a ditch. Trooper Jake Thompson insisted he pulled the trigger as Lewis revved the engine of his Nissan Sentra and jerked his steering wheel as if trying to mow him down.

“I had to shoot this man,” Thompson can be heard telling a supervisor on video recorded by his dash-mounted camera at the shooting scene in rural Screven County, midway between Savannah and Augusta. “And I’m just scared.”

But new investigative details obtained by The Associated Press and the never-before-released dashcam video of the August 2020 shooting have raised fresh questions about how the trooper avoided prosecution with nothing more than a signed promise never to work in law enforcement again. Use-of-force experts who reviewed the footage for AP said the shooting appeared to be unjustified.

    • Irremarkable@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      The fact that there isn’t a minimum of 2 years classroom work before they even get a ride along is fucking ridiculous.

      • hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        As a German, the contrast in education and training for police is unfathomable. Yes, we still have a problem with some cops being Nazis, but cops don’t kill people because “I was scared” here. They usually kill them after an act of terrorism that killed a lot more people, or if they had a standoff for like 2h and the guy has a gun.

        Which absolutely is the better way.

        But ofc, banning guns is really helpful in the first place, because wouldn’t you know, banning a killing device rapidly decreases the amount of killings. Funny how that works. I would even argue it’s cause and effect and not just coincidental.

  • Ejh3k@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I was scared when I was a 19 year old doing a patrol through Sadr City in 2003, while manning the .50 cal and having dozens of kids suddenly show up and throwing rocks at me. Did I waste them even though I would have been justified because it wasn’t uncommon that patrols would go through markets and peopled start throwing produce and mix a grenade in?

    No. Because I was well trained and realized that life is precious. And I was dealing with those rocks a lot longer than 1.6 seconds.

    • Carlo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Ayy, I was up north in '03, but I ran some Sadr City patrols in '04. Vivid memories of watching Cheaper by the Dozen in full kit while we listened to the mortars walking in. And a complex ambush on the way back to BIAP. I was on a 240 in the second truck. There was some musical car horn that seemed to signal it—not La Cucaracha, but something like that; I think one of these days I’ll hear it again somewhere and have a legit ptsd flashback—and a fruit stand or something on the right exploded, and a car behind me somewhere as well, I believe. Then some dudes came out on a balcony behind and to the left and started licking rpgs at us. Good times. Csm got some shrapnel in his ass, which didn’t improve his temper, but at least we got a lot of jokes out of it.

      • Ejh3k@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Oh man. My first IED was very strange. We were driving on what we called route kill zone, and there was some traffic. And then we came to an overpass and seemingly everyone else took the off ramp. Came out the other side and just blammo. I saw the vehicle in front of me get pushed a lane over and then disappear into smoke and dust. I locked up the brakes so I wouldn’t smash into them.

        Turned out there was a sniper down the road and a can full of guys with RPGs on the bridge behind us. But we had no casualties or significant vehicle damage, so they apparently dipped. We hightailed it to a rally point that was literally 500 meters from where the attack happened. Front vehicle thought we were the ones that got hit.

    • Rampsquatch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yea, but I’m betting you had more training than this clown. Maybe the cops need more than a couple weeks before they are given the power of a firearm, maybe I’m crazy.

      • treadful@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        He had plenty of training. He PIT the dude’s car, and shot him in the forehead 1.6 seconds after stopping his car. Lots of training went into that.

        It’s just the wrong training.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      If the cops want to be militarized, they should be bound by the UCMJ and face the same consequences.

  • Iapar@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I really don’t get why people don’t start shooting police. As I understand it guns are allowed to “defend yourself against the government”. Police is the government and they clearly are out of control shooting people.

    So either use your weapons against the government or make guns illegal if you don’t use them anyway.

    So in the end there are less cops which in return means less people shot dead by cops or cops are less scared because people don’t have guns and so they also don’t get shot by cops.

    What I am saying is: either use your guns or make them illegal if you don’t use them anyway.

    • emax_gomax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Most people don’t wanna kill each other. And shooting back is probably going to raise the likelihood of getting murdered (i don’t have any source for this). That said it is still absurd how the police flagrantly disregard peoples liberties, extra judicially execute them and get away with it with impunity. The societal contract is dead.

      • Iapar@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        In my opinion shooting back raises the likelihood of getting out alive as you are not just a sitting duck.

        And I to think people generally don’t want to murder. But what people want more than not to kill is to not be killed.

        So use your gun or lose your gun. Doesn’t make sense otherwise.

        • Frozengyro@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Okay, you just killed a cop. What do you think happens next? Do you think its over and done with, just go home for the day? No, you are, at best, going to be arrested and put on trial for murder. It doesn’t matter if you were justified or not. And when they arrest you, it will be at gun point. So, will you let them arrest you at gun point or will you start shooting the police again?

          You’re also assuming your some badass who will walk away without getting shot also or in any way injured. Not to mention the emotional toll of killing someone has on most people.

          • Iapar@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Okay so why have guns then for the average person when they don’t get used to defend themselves against the governing forces at hand? Shooting at random adults and children is okay but shooting cops is over the line?

            Shoot governing forces or ban guns is my point. And everybody replaying just ignores the ban guns part.

          • Sabata@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Trial for killing a cop in America? They going to send the entire department and turn you, your house, and family into swiss cheese.

  • systemglitch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Fuck that cop, but also, the guy was stupid enough to not pull over. He didn’t deserve death, but I bet he could have avoided death had he just done what he was legally obligated to do.

    I’m very curious to see how many downvotes this rationale will get.

    • Killing_Spark@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Stupidity shouldn’t result in death. And not following the law also shouldn’t result in death as long as lives aren’t actively endangered.

      Aside from that, chasing the guy over a broken light was pretty dumb of the cop. Noncooperative vehicles are a BIG hazard to other traffic. Write down the number plate, visit them at home. The taillight will still be broken tomorrow.

      • Subverb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        We both know he was using the broken tail light as probable cause for a stop. He wanted him to pull over because he suspected he was drunk or on drugs or simply because he was black with a broken tail light.

        As soon as the man didn’t pull over the cop got his hackles up and now he was definitely going to stop him. Escalation is the way with cops.

    • catsarebadpeople@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Nice whataboutism! Of course he should have stopped but that’s not even close to the point and fuck you for trying to make it the point when a man was murdered. You’re a bad person

    • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      So it turns out that racially insensitive victim blaming and bootlicking is worth at least a few dozen downvotes. Congratulations?

  • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    For Bacon, Lewis’ son, the lack of charges is an open wound. He worries no one will remember what happened given the passage of almost four years — and the number of others killed by police under questionable circumstances.

    At this point, the damage is done. A child has to grow up without his father. They had the trooper in jail for 100 days, paid the Bacon family 4.5 million, and only agreed not to prosecute the trooper because he signed a pledge to never work in law enforcement again. So they know he F-ed up, but what’s with the slap on the wrist for the trooper? He shot this black man in the forehead, 1.6 seconds after stopping his patrol car. I don’t even understand why he got out of his car so quick after successfully pitting the guys car. The guys car is perpendicular to the road, in a ditch, with your squad car behind it. Why are you jumping out with your gun drawn? God, you’d think he’d be jumping out to make sure the driver was OK, but nope.

    Someone driving intoxicated should be punished, not murdered.

  • rez_doggie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m all about an eye for an eye at this point. Let his family hunt him down like the feral pig he is.

    • LowleeKun@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      Deutsch
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      The answer to hate and murder? You guessed it! More hate and murder. I get the feeling but this is a really bad take if honest.

  • TheAuthor_13@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Welp, if Butch Cassidy over there can’t be a police person anymore, maybe karma will catch up to him & he’ll catch a hot cop slug in the forehead for no good reason too.