Summary

House Republicans are considering a 20% cut to SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) benefits, impacting over 22 million households, as part of a $5 trillion deficit reduction plan.

The proposed changes to SNAP would save $247 billion over a decade by rolling back a Biden-era increase tied to the USDA’s “thrifty food plan.”

Critics argue the cuts could harm vulnerable populations and reduce demand for food production, while Republicans view the changes as a way to curb spending and encourage employment.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Well, we also have billionaires in this country, when that should not even be a thing. It’s time to Make America Great Again, and tax these fuckers at 92%. Like the 1950s.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    …and I’m sure all the people that suffer from this will be blaming the motherfucking DEMOCRATS if/when this comes to pass.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    4 days ago

    This is short sighted.

    Hungry folks’ anger knows no limits. They have nothing to lose and everything to gain.

    • lemmylommy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 days ago

      Well, prices are so high because too many people are demanding food. Let some starve to death, boom, less demand and lower prices. Get two birds stoned at once. The second bird being MAGA reveling in other people’s suffering.

  • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Does anyone even believe in deficits anymore? Like even the rubiest of rubes have been watching trillions of dollars worth of weapons flow out with no debate whatsoever.

  • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    4 days ago

    Wait until they find out the SNAP program (aka food stamps) is run by the Department of Agriculture because it’s about increasing demand for agricultural products, not helping the poor. For comparison, TANF (aka welfare) is under the Department of Health and Human Services.

  • Limonene@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    SNAP pays out almost nothing already. You can’t eat on $292 per month, especially if you’re poor enough that you actually qualify for SNAP.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Is that amount for a family, cause I can definitely eat on $292 a month in a very expensive city. I’d need to make adjustments, but it’d easily be doable.

      • Limonene@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 days ago

        It’s for a household of 1, in Milwaukee. I could do it here if I cooked every meal and ate meat at most twice a week.

        A person poor enough to qualify for this probably doesn’t have time to shop properly and cook for every meal, and probably doesn’t have a full kitchen.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Ya, it’d be a lot of vegetarian meals. If you can get to something like a Sams Club or Costco (although that has it’s own cost) you could get things like eggs, rice, oats, and even some spices over a few months to get you going, really cheap compared to other places.

          Even being able to get something like a bulk frozen blueberries to be your fruit for the month that you can put in the oatmeal for example would go a long way, but is probably too pricey if you’re buying it in small quantities.

          Trying to do that at an expensive grocery store and no access to cheaper bulk pricing would make that less comfortable.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            I have a Costco membership. I don’t buy things like this or frozen vegetables there because they cost more per unit than they do at Kroger (let alone Lidl or Aldi).

            • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              Really? That’s interesting, even rice and oats?

              Edit: where I’m at for spices, you can get 3-4x the amount at Costco vs the grocery store, but on a budget like this you’d probably only get 1 a month while you built up the kitchen. I’ll check rice again next time I’m out but I swear it’s cheaper as well. Haven’t bought oats in awhile, but used to have them for breakfast daily (the basic quaker oats kind, not the expensive flavored sachets)

              Edit: Also I’m annoyed that you can’t see Costco warehouse food prices online. You get the online/delivery prices which are raised making price shopping more difficult.

  • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 days ago

    They need higher crime rates to enable pushing for more authoritarian spending on police and enforcement.