What did you have to prepare for a Harris win? It’d either be life as usual or slightly better. Do you prepare plans for if you find five dollars on the ground on your commute?
I understand it’s likely a figure of speech but the title is silly and reflects poorly.
I’m at least a quarter by myself hahahah…ha
Huh, that’s a shame. Thanks for the info.
Have you tried fried duck?
I have not, I’m just curious as you seem duck-knowledgeable.
Looks more like a disquieting Willy Wonka.
A game of telephone across generations. Some of the message got misconstrued.
Because the media loves to pretend anyone is an expert on everything. Assigning outsized significance to someone’s words if they’ve ever been mentioned in any other nedia before. And sometimes even if they haven’t.
Pretty sure they were used in self-defense in a more dangerous era. Might be an urban legend though, I never verified.
Those donuts have divots.
Where is the jam secreted?
I feel like this is only really a lever that can be tweaked on the subset of American men who didn’t vote or voted for Trump and are in a relationship with a woman who is part of this movement. Which I can’t believe is very large.
This is not putting the burden on women of this movement but it will inevitably be used in fascist talking points about how the “libruls are brainwashing women to not have sex with you”, further propaganda that will go into radicalizing young men.
Yeah, more confirmation that being a shithead isn’t cultural. It’s an individuals problem that is unfortunately ubiquitous.
I thought he was always on Fox. Which is merely a very stupid, malicious child pretending to be a news channel.
Title feels like clickbait. Would be more convinced it was deliberate clickbait if the thumbnail didn’t directly show the sign saying “negro” and not the actual slur.
But that just makes the choice of title more confusing.
Perhaps you could say that if you arbitrarily remove any nuance or qualifications at all from the statement.
A reasonable person would see a message advising women to hide who they vote for from their signficant others and question why they (Harris’s advisors) thought the message would land. And what that says about the people those women are married to.
They’ll unleash such violent violence that women’s voice won’t ever again.
No need for (a). That’s barely a cover and certainly not part of his racist mathematics.
36% doesn’t tell a clean story. How many dozens of percentage raise would workers get if that CEO’s raise was evenly distributed?
Sorry, I didn’t sanitize my output, assuming this would forestalled by the redirect to my other comment explaining I see how I was applying my implicit biases and connotations to what “argument” means.
I didn’t call out the addition of competitions then because I didn’t think this would sprawl as long as it did. I will do so now:
I never said a word about competitions and that, in my mind, has no inherent bearing on the healthiness of a relationship as there can be different types of competition. So we can immediately excise that from further discussion.
Addressing the sole part that is relevant now: I now agree arguments aren’t necessarily angry, by everyone’s definition. But that was the tone and definition with which I made the original comments up until that first reply to chicken.
You can see that segment as a revision of my first reply to you. Have a good whatever.
Why did no one ask why a dad would be able to beg for respite because of his period?