(grin) I am now picturing a totally stoned AI sat with a bong in its hand going “oh woooooooow man!! This is good shit!!”

You realise that was the working title for Star Trek 5, but then they went in another direction…

Guantanamo Bay is still open.

There are still prisoners there, held for nearly a quarter of a century without trial.

Please – Tell me again how he respects The Constitution, democracy and isn’t a fascist.

Or are you only scared because they are coming after white folks now?

Pretty sure dodos don’t float any more :)

Yeah – this sounds more of a reasonable argument.

I just need to remember that time I said that thing to that person.

That has me wallowing in anxiety for… oh a good long while.

That’s how it looks on my dashboard.

Might be a setting in “Display My Blog” (or whatever) but I kind of like it like that

That’s true. I was involved in the screenshot, and I am an edgy private school kid.

Except I am not edgy, nor did I go to a private school, nor am I a kid.

But I was involved in the screenshot :)

Also goes down well if you include it in the odd sermon or two.

Population control.

Gotta start young I guess

Yeah – I am starting to realise I may have misread it.

But Pete Agnew… would someone in a band called Nazareth have the potential to be a werewolf?

So Paul Weller is off the hook.

But alas Paul Agnew (a Scottish conductor) may suddenly discover his desire to be a werewolf is not all it was cut out to be…

(It is amazing just how much fun finding how many historic figures have a with first name starting P and a last name ending with W and who are still alive. You would be surprised how complicated it is).

I don’t think that’s what it stands for… although it would make you quite flexible in certain areas :)

(Sorry – that was beneath me).

Honestly?

No.

The original comment was “you can’t reason someone out of a belief they weren’t reasoned into” and I was just playing on that by trying to reason them out of the belief that you can’t reason someone out of a belief…

Or at least suggest that you can reason someone out of a belief they weren’t reasoned into. Because it seems within reason that you can reason someone out of a belief they weren’t reasoned into and the reason I suggest that is it seems perfectly reasonable.

(Yeah – sometimes I just get bored and want to see how long I can keep a sentence going and use the same word in it before it breaks down into total chaos).

I’m not sure I believe that.

I don’t think that’s true, and I don’t think you really believe that either…

Because astrology is something that lends itself to clear academic reporting?

People with planet sized egos?

The stars of the profession?