• GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    Zero loyalties.

    If Firefox did something similar, they’d be off my drive before I finished the article.

    • tO0l@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Chrome is a web browser created and maintained by an advertising company. This whole situation was never going to go any other way.

      Firefox is equally doomed since so much of their current revenue comes from Google.

      • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        We have a foundation dedicated to the development of an entire kernel, but a web browser is a stretch.

        (It indeed may be a stretch)

        • wvstolzing@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Who’s “we”, though? Here’s the list of Linux Foundation members: https://www.linuxfoundation.org/about/members It’s a foundation by, and for, commercial interests; not the users. If the same interests made up a foundation to develop a browser, it wouldn’t be different from Chrome; because in the realm where browsers are supposed to work, those ‘commercial interests’ would demand doing what Chrome does.

          It’s a ‘happy accident’ that with respect to a unix-like OS kernel, the interests of the industry ended up being compatible with the interests of the user.

  • huskypenguin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m curious what would happen if chrome is split from googles core business. That won’t happen of course, because we live in hell, but it would be great.