• criss_cross@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      Devs are beholden to customers.

      And the highest paying customers are enterprises that want to advertise. No one cares about the lemmings that actually watch videos.

    • jaybone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 days ago

      It seems like a lot of this perception originates in the gaming industry where in some cases the devs actually do have quite a bit of control over user experience. In the rest of the software world, this stuff is driven by product management / marketing / whatever title they give to the people who define requirements.

  • MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    “Why isn’t one of the most expensive to operate websites free?!”

    There’s a reason there are zero actual competitors in this space (maybe TikTok but it’s full of its own problems). Only a company as big as Google can afford to run at this scale. Feel free to add your business plan on how to make YouTube free without ads and without it shutting down in 3 months.

      • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 days ago

        This but unironically? One of the reasons there’s no YouTube alternative is because it’s not profitable, but the other is it’s a monopoly. If YouTube failed tomorrow I’m sure a lot of free alternatives (Odyssey, Peertube instances, etc) would blow up

  • SomeGuy69@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    15 days ago

    Google has destroyed their own ads revenue by adding more and more ads. Imagine they’d have stopped with simple side banner and people would’ve not even bothered to use an adblocker because of it. This tiny little banner would’ve been worth as much as the multiple seconds ads now. The companies would pay as much, as there’d be no alternate.

  • hdnsmbt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    15 days ago

    YouTube is free, accessible and innovative, though? That meme doesn’t make a lot of sense.

  • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 days ago

    The problem with the “free” part is that hosting videos isn’t free so there needs to be monetization in some form.