• Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    59
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    When is this guy going to start wearing a turtle neck? Yeah, he’s been capitalizing alright, enough to own 1 billion dollars worth of mega yatchs.

    How about he promises to stop raping the industry with his buddies at Microsoft, Sony and Nintendo.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        4 days ago

        "Simp squad, UNITE!

        Hurry guys, we have to protect daddy Gaben. This heretic must know how shit his opinion is. Be sure to be clever! We know its actually impossible to defend billionaires with logic so just insult the comment itself!"

        Imagine defending a man that spends 100 million a year on yatch maintenance.

        30% of all the money you spend on games goes directly to Gabens Greed Fund, and you clap. Gross.

          • mossy_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            4 days ago

            Steam itself has an offline mode, even if they sell online-only games. I use it pretty often.

          • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            You can pay for online multiplayer and not have an offline option on consoles. There’s no reason to believe that paying for it would make more games playable offline.

        • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          You don’t remember pre-Steam then, because it was already headed down this path. Piracy and used copies have been the boogieman for a long time, and doing anything they can to prevent both was always the natural destination of the industry, unless more people start shopping on GOG.

          • index@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            You don’t remember pre-Steam

            Do you? pre-steam you would install games and play them outside steam

            • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 days ago

              Everyone was experimenting with their own lousy DRM, including those that had activation limits and would require a phone call to reset them.

        • weker01@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yea, right. It would’ve been another platform to capitalize on the internet becoming more available and digital distribution becoming viable.

          • Grimy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            “Daddy Gaben can do the bad thing because he was first to do it, heehee”

            The fact is we need new regulations and laws but the government will never act if bootlickers like you are the majority.

            Stop defending billionaires that are actively robbing you.

            • weker01@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              Nice strawmen you got there. Where the fuck did you see me defend a billionaire?!

              I am just being realistic here. Our current society enables greed and greed would’ve always led to this situation or worse. We need to change the system fundamentally to change that.

              • index@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                3 days ago

                You are not being realistic you are being stupid. You are indeed defending a evil corporation and a billionare with a fleet of mega yachts by stating that their work is necessary. They are needed for what? For a long time before they rolled in and started misleading kids tossing money in marketing you didn’t need a third party proprietary launcher to run software and you still don’t need it now.

                • weker01@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Where did I say they are necessary? Where did I say you need a proprietary third party launcher?

                  What other statements do you want to put in my mouth?

                  • index@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    The original comment was that without them you would probably still own the games you paid for and you argued that if not them someone else would have do the same thus giving the idea like others have expressed here that steam is somewhat fine where it is.