Summary

The “Department of Government Efficiency” won’t be a real government agency. In fact, it won’t even be part of the federal government.

Led by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, the advisory commission aims to cut $2 trillion in spending, reduce regulations, and downsize the federal workforce.

Critics question its effectiveness, given its outsider status, potential conflicts of interest with Musk’s businesses, and Ramaswamy’s focus on mass layoffs and agency eliminations.

While some praise its potential for reforms, others warn it may undermine civil service and prioritize “slash-and-burn” cuts over thoughtful changes.

  • MrVilliam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    6 days ago

    I love the irony of putting two people in charge of an efficiency department. Satire is dead.

    • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      6 days ago

      But the GAO doesn’t have an acronym that is also a funny meme. How is Elon meant to give a shit about it if it doesn’t make the 14 year old boys laugh?

      • dhork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Hey it’s not just a meme, it’s DeCeNtRaliZeD fInAnCe. I bought some DOGE as a joke several years ago, now it is worth real money. I sold some the last time it was at $0.69, because of course I did.

        I have some left, the price is currently $0.36 but maybe Elon can meme it up to $4.20 and I can retire early.

    • seaQueue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      It’s the GAO but with more corruption, blackjack and hookers. Oh and it’s not actually part of the government.

    • Atom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Shhhh. I don’t want these two anywhere near an office or department with merit.

  • Magister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 days ago

    If they say to Trump “cut FBI, cut NASA”, Trump will do it, and all fund for space exploration will got to SpaceX by the way.

        • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          What?? Just… straight from Congress?? I think this kind of highlights how this efficiency department has no real power. They don’t have the authority to plan or cut or divert money from NASA projects and Congress decides NASA budget.

          • Zron@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            6 days ago

            They don’t have the authority under the current government.

            A government is just a series of rules enforced by people who follow those rules. If enough people decide to ignore the rules, they can do whatever they want.

            The last defense for those rules is the military, but trump wants to fire a ton of generals and appoint his own people, who won’t bat at an eye at blatant constitutional violations.

            Give it a few months and the DOGE duo will probably have significant sway over budgets, regardless of how much authority they have on paper.

  • Euphorazine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 days ago

    Elons two main businesses only exist because of government handouts. 7500 electric vehicle tax credit over 100,000s of cars is well into the billions. With how close Tesla came to insolvency, the ability to reach more customers surely saved Tesla.

    And spaceX (and more money for starlink) he has got billions more directly and is slated to receive even more even though SpaceX has missed deadlines over and over and the goal of propping up SpaceX was so we could have a cheaper option than Russia to getting people to the ISS is now not even on the table.

    What’s the over/under twitter gets government subsidies with some paper thin argument like “it’s the public square of the Internet, so it’s basically a park, and since we get 10x the yearly visitors than the grand canyon, we deserve 10x it’s budget to help maintain our “free speech” park”

  • gedaliyah@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    “Don’t worry, Trump will be stopped because of the LAW”, has to be the stupidest argument that people are touting lately. When has that ever mattered?

  • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    This only matters if people in the federal government are willing to say “You don’t have any legal authority to tell me to do anything and I don’t want to help you, so go away” which I wouldn’t count on always being the case