• Bookmeat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    All these analysts trying to figure out how this tyrant who will be in control of all the Federal government can’t do this or that because a piece of paper says so. SMH.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      It’s not the piece of paper, it’s the amount of people who have to go along with something for it to happen. A lot of his and his zealous proposals are wildly unpopular.

      Also Trump is a raging narcissist. If the focus ends up on project 2025 and makes him look bad, he will ditch whatever that item is. So I guess pick your battles and make noise.

      • Bookmeat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        12 days ago

        You’re exactly correct. The law as it stands is irrelevant to what these analysts think. I’m not saying Trump can call every shot, but it doesn’t really get any easier to change or skirt laws he dislikes. Anyone who leans on the “but the law says…” argument is praying.

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    To the glee of the fascist dictator currently attempting Ukrainian genocide.

  • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    Oh, no, we’re out of NATO.

    Or at the least we’ll have a CJCs that stops all NATO cooperation, so we’re in in name only.

    Who am I kidding, either the CJCs or SecDef WILL be Michael Flynn.

  • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    12 days ago

    Trump would be impeached if he tried. You think Raytheon and Boeing can’t buy enough congressmen to impeach him?

    • Poppa_Mo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      12 days ago

      He’s been fucking impeached twice already.

      How do you people have such short fucking memories?

      Nothing sticks to this dirtbag. That’s how he got that stupid nickname.

    • xenomor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 days ago

      Are we still pretending that impeachment in the US is any kind of meaningful threat to a president?

      • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        If you understand it as a trial where a president who has done something wrong is held accountable according to the law, then no that’s idealist nonsense.

        If you understand it as a mechanism that allows 50+ senators to replace the president with the VP if they want to, yes.

    • Digitalprimate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      Um, you know those companies can sell weapons and craft to other countries right? Trump will still be happy for Europeans to buy weapons.