• alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    Harris was popular when she first announced. She then proceeded to run to the cold dead embrace of the Biden campaign.

    Progressive policy is more popular than any candidate, if they focused on rent control, free healthcare, free childcare, free college and other immediate, material improvements to people’s conditions, they’d have won in a landslide. Instead they abandoned the rest of the country to pursue the <10% of republicans who weren’t in the bag for Trump.

    • FutileRecipe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      27 days ago

      Harris was popular when she first announced.

      I don’t think she was popular when first announced, rather the fact that not-Biden was popular.

      • El Barto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        27 days ago

        I’m convinced that Biden would have won.

        I personally believe that this is not Biden’s or Kamala’s fault. It’s the old-school Democrat establishment’s fault. They did Bernie dirty in 2016. And then they did the same to Biden in these elections. Lichtman predicted a Biden win, bad debate performance and all, and the dems fucked it up.

        To be transparent, I still believed Lichtman when he said Harris would win. I will never believe in his stuff again, unless he adds new keys or something.

        • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          27 days ago

          I personally believe that this is not Biden’s or Kamala’s fault. It’s the old-school Democrat establishment’s fault. They did Bernie dirty in 2016. And then they did the same to Biden in these elections.

          Yes. Every time, even in 2020 when the mood of the country was very different, they are afraid to run anything other than center-right candidates because they “aren’t electable”. Guess what - your corporatist center-right candidates are consistently priming people to receive the protectionist messages from the fascists, Maybe fucking try something different some time, fucking DNC!

          • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            27 days ago

            OK, the next question is: How do we convey this to liberals who think we want the dems to lose?

            • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              27 days ago

              In the words of my boomer mother, “Things aren’t going to get better until the boomers die off.”

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      Instead they abandoned the rest of the country to pursue the <10% of republicans who weren’t in the bag for Trump.

      YES! I held my nose and voted for her, she turned her back on everything that looked like hope and change during her campaign. Her reaction to R looking weak was to jump to the right, somehow.

      Having said that, anyone who needed to be wooed to not vote for Trump was a lost cause, but she literally turned away from every sort of policy decision that excites Democrats.

      • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        That’s bizarre, were people confused by the wording? Was there a media blitz by local landlords? More people are renters than landlords so obviously the majority doesn’t want rent to be higher.