• OceanSoap@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    What??? We literally saw democracy play out. You can’t even use the excuse that he lost the popular vote, he won every type of democratic way we have.

    You know what wasn’t democracy? Installing candidates into primaries over democratically popular candidates. Hillary in 2016, Biden in 2020 and Kamala in 2024. In every single one of these primaries, they did everything they could to shut down anyone popular who showed any sign of having a backbone, even though they killed democracy as it happened.

    What we saw was a backlash to a stifling of democracy. Democracy won last night.

    • zik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      Trump has threatened to end democracy in the US. So yesterday may end up being the last time anyone in the US gets to vote.

      I wouldn’t call that a win for democracy.

      • OceanSoap@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        15 days ago

        There is zero proof that he’ll be a dictator. My source is that he was president for 4 years and was not a dictator.

        The only thing you’re basing your claim on is an offhand joke he made about fully shutting down the borders on the first day, then opening them back up with better safeguards. If you watch the whole clip, you’ll understand that.

    • pingveno@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      15 days ago

      If you’re referencing Bernie Sanders in 2016 and 2020, he wasn’t “democratically popular” in either race. That simply is not supported by polling or election results. He was well behind Clinton by all metrics. Then in 2020, he was briefly “winning” because several similar candidates were splitting the center-left lane. The moment the center-left lane narrowed, Sanders’ lead evaporated.

      It’s SOP for candidates to more or less clear the field for an incumbent president. This is partially because of a perceived effect from a strong primary challenger weakening an incumbent. So Democrats were just doing what both parties have been doing for the last half century.

      The change from Biden was in response to clear reactions from the US electorate. The electorate saw Biden’s debate performance and was not impressed. There wasn’t time to run a process, so Kamala was the obvious choice given a non-ideal situation. But the electorate got what it wanted in terms of an option that wasn’t elderly.