• DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Is there a technical term for when a company or corporation makes a statement that is a blatant bad faith argument like that?

    If none exists, I’d call it “Corporate massturbation”. Because they’re trying to jerk everyone off.

    Edit Here’s another one: “Corporate Anal Ostriching.” Because they’re shoving their heads up their own asses

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s always the same argument. “This objectively bad thing for consumers is actually good for consumers because it allows us to offer a lower price!”

      No, dipshits, you are choosing to make your product shittier than necessary and charging customers to undo your shittery. That’s not some external thing, it’s something that you chose.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 month ago

    Missing in this thread, courts are not known for their technological literacy. So companies just lie to them. Like, all the time. This isn’t meant to withstand consumer scrutiny.

  • muculent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 month ago

    Near monopolies say monopolistic behavior is good for you and does not only benefit them. More bullshit at 11.

  • Scott@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 month ago

    Never buy a phone from your carrier, they will do some evil shit to try and force you to stay

    • five82@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      It was probably incompetence more than malice but T-Mobile customer service incorrectly told me multiple times that I was not allowed to pay off my phone balance early to unlock it. I’m on US Mobile now and I’ll never go back to postpaid.

  • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    “T-Mobile claims that with a 60-day unlocking rule, “consumers risk losing access to the benefits of free or heavily subsidized handsets because the proposal would force providers to reduce the line-up of their most compelling handset offers.”

    I’m I stupid or are they threatening to arbitrarily raise prices for no reason other than spite?

    Also wtf is a “handset”?

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    That’s such bullshit. Locked phones are like google accounts. At the end of the 2 years of owning it supposedly, you end up with all this shit you accumulated and no way to save it anywhere practically.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    They aggressively buy spin off services to ensure a locked market as well.

    Cricket wireless was a on AT&T network provider that outshined AT&T because it allowed any device + better prices.

    So naturally they bought them out and shutdown the any allowed devices to force you into buying a carrier phone to ensure your device will be locked.

  • stratoscaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Why does that even matter? Currently, if you have a locked phone and switch carriers, you have to buy an entirely new phone anyways.

    At least this way, a user can pay once, and then hop around carriers depending on what’s cheap.

    Also there’s no shot that locking users to phones costs that much because the unlocked version of a phone is only like 15-20% more expensive. Since when did you ever get a 70% discount on the MSRP of a phone for buying it locked??? They’re straight ass lying lmao

    • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      That’s the problem. You have to buy a brand new phone because your phone is locked. With this law if you bought your phone outright you could switch carriers within 2 months if you found a better deal and still keep your phone. Can’t currently do that in the US.

      And the whole locking cost is made up. It’s simple to make a phone “unlocked”. The cost in inflated on purpose to create a need so they can offer locked at a discount.

  • Venicon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Fuck the lot of them. Shop around for the best deal that doesn’t try to screw you over.