• nehal3m@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’ve never thought about it like that, but you raise an interesting point. From the point of view of patients insurance is an inextricable part of health care. I’m not so sure you can separate them that easily. Even in Western Europe the trend is towards privatization so when something happens to me health wise my first concern is insurance, never mind the actual problem. It’s a tragedy. Let’s just go back to setting up a mandatory fund and paying out from that without the profit seeking middlemen. We don’t need them.

      • Billiam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        You know what’s really stupid?

        Every American who has private insurance right now, could pay that exact same amount instead to the federal government and let it pay our medical bills, and it would result in more people getting care and less cost for the healthcare industry.

        Of course, for some reason, some people are strongly opposed to the destruction of a multi-billion-dollar rent-seeking middleman industry and also opposed to healthcare going to certain, shall we say, melaninistically-blessed Americans.

        • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          Mine costs my employer and myself $15,000 yearly. Colorado marketplace insurance for a “silver” plan (probably very expensive to actually use) is over $8k.

          If we all just pooled that money it’d make Medicare for All a reality.

              • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                That would be nice, but I can’t see lobbyist allowing it. It state power really essential?

                Maybe s co-operative insurance company could fit inside the current framework without legislative change.

                (Obviously, I’m just spitballing here)

                • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Yeah, it could fit in the current framework so I guess state power isn’t essential for creating it. State power is definitely essential to do things like negotiate drug pricing like Medicare does. We saw the power of that recently.

                  • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    The state certainly brings volume and that is leveraged for negotiations. There’s no way a new insurer could have that market share instantly.