Education level has become the best predictor for how someone will vote

edition.cnn.com

Education level has become the best predictor for how someone will vote

edition.cnn.com

Skeezix@lemmy.worldM to

Politics Without Trolls@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month ago

Analysis: Why education level has become the best predictor for how someone will vote | CNN Politics

edition.cnn.com

American voters are divided in many ways – by gender, by race, by region – and any of these can be used to explain the current state of politics.

TLDR: less educated people vote for trump

Chat

Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
arrow-up
2·
1 month ago
It’s “führer”, which is what we’re kinda hoping to avoid.
- Zachariah@lemmy.world
  link
  fedilink
  English
  arrow-up
  2·
  1 month ago
  sad but true

Politics Without Trolls@lemmy.world

politics_no_um@lemmy.world

Create a post

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics_no_um@lemmy.world

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

No shitposters, trolls, paid influencers, bad faith actors, organisations, or foreign government agencies. Should there be any question, your true intent will be determined on a case by case basis decided by your post frequency and overall reputation within the wider Lemmy community.
Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. - Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
No Universal Monk

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

1 user / day
1 user / week
405 users / month
983 users / 6 months
1 local subscriber
65 subscribers
145 Posts
259 Comments
Modlog