And why?

  • mlfh@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 month ago

    Forgejo, a Gitea fork used by Codeberg. I chose it because it’s got the right balance of features to weight for my small use case, it has FOSS spirit, and it’s got a lovely package maintainer for FreeBSD that makes deployment and maintenance easy peasy (thanks Stefan <3).

    • zelifcam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’ve been meaning to switch over from Gitea to Forgejo for ever. I’ll get it done tomorrow ;)

    • thirdBreakfast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      +1 for Forgejo. I started on Gogs, then gathered that there had been some drama with that and Gitea. Forgejo is FOSS, simple to get going, and comfortable to use if you’re coming from GitHub. It’s actively maintained, and communication with the project is great.

  • m4m4m4m4@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 month ago

    Codeberg. I host my web portfolio live there and even did a small contribution to kbin when it was alive. It’s great though now I’d want to look at forgejo.

  • ElectronBadger@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Codeberg for all my projects, both private and public. Some are mirrored to Github. Also Codeberg Pages and its Woodpecker CI.

  • DasFaultier@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Gitlab at work, because, well, it’s there and it works just fine.

    Forgejo at home, because it’s far less resource hungry.

    In the end Git is a) a command line tool for b) distributed working, so it really doesn’t matter much which central web service you put in place, you can always get your local copy via git clone REPO.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    self-hosted gitlab.

    I love it. I can clone external repos on a schedule and build my projects based on my local cache. I’m even running some automation tasks like image deployments out of it too.

  • sudoer777@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    As much as I hate GitHub, for in-person projects involving multiple people I usually end up having no choice since they usually think GitHub is the most important programming tool ever and nothing I do is going to convince them to create an account on something that’s not GitHub.

    For personal stuff I use Forgejo and disable everything except the code view, so I have a quick way to show people stuff I’m doing (for career reasons).

    If I was doing a project with multiple people and actually got to chose the platform I would probably use Forgejo or Codeberg and make use of the project management features.

    Pijul looks interesting but the ecosystem is very lacking and it doesn’t integrate well with Guix which I base a lot of my workflows around, so until this improves switching to pijul creates more problems than it fixes. The only other VCS and frontend I’m familiar with is GitLab which I don’t use anymore self-hosted since Forgejo is more performant and the main version randomly deleted all my repos and changed all sorts of stuff.

    cgit also looks interesting, I might look into it.

  • dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    I use Gitlab, but i’m becoming increasingly more unhappy with it over time.

    When i have enough resources run another local machine, im planning to switch to switch to Codeberg, with selfhosted Woodpecker CI instead

  • toastal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    For Darcs I have been using darcs hub & mirroring to my server. That said Smederee has slowly but surely been shaping up to be a better replacement (recently got reStructureText support!); once they have obliterate support, I will be tempted to make it primary for real since it covers all the basics.

    For Pijul, I can really only use it self-hosted over SSH. Nest is far too feature barren to be usable—especially without the ability to fetch tarballs for instance where you can’t have or use the pijul binary for fetching (which is a bit ironic since the Pijul binary has an archive to create tarballs, Nest just doesn’t expose it). Pijul is faster & the key concept of separating your commit ID from details (such as Darcs or Git using Name <e@mail.address> as the identifier) is much nicer not just for privacy if wanted but changing these details for whatever your reasons maybe (imagine changing your name after marriage or sex change & trying to convince all projects you’ve committed to to rewrite their history with your new info to not be confused or dead-named—most maintainers would ignore you). Someone should write a decent, lightweight forge so Pijul can be usable.

    I use Darcs/Pijul since Patch Theory is a better model than snapshot-based version control as seen in Git/Mercurial & others. Since neither have many hosting or forge options, there are not many choices (answering the “why?”).

    If using Git, an inferior VCS IMO, things are now going hosted on Codeberg. In the past, I had paid for SourceHut & while it was a generally nice, lightweight experience I was disappointed with the features & progress to the point I didn’t feel I was getting good value (also no Darcs or Pijul support, just Git & Mercurial). Since I don’t write any of my own code using Git anymore, I don’t really bother self-hosting cgit, Ayllu, or something. That said, Forgejo is a pretty disappointing in its direction as they choose to clone more features from MS GitHub than even Gitea which basically leaves you with MS GitHub but FOSS without addressing some core issues (PR workflow is not good, YAML-based CI is not good, & so on); a better sell IMO would be fundamental improvements on these old models/workflows that would inspire leaving for technical reasons instead of social/political/philosophical reasons.

  • ramenu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Codeberg for public repositories, cgit (if that even counts) on my own server for private ones

  • Luu Tuyen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I used GitLab for personal projects, and I use GitHub for contributing to other project

    GitLab is partially open source, GitLab can be self-hosted while GitHub does not

  • GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I use github to star other repos because almost all repos are on github. A star supports the project.

    I host my stuff on github because everyone else is on github and can star my repos.

    I have access to codeberg

    • toastal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      https://dagster.io/blog/fake-stars

      ‘Stars’ are such a dubious, gamed feature telling you little value about a project’s quality. It doesn’t really ‘support’ a project, but it does feed into the anxiety & social media sludge on the platform. We would be better without them.