The Alternative for Germany (AfD) has gained ground in three recent state elections, caused an uproar in the Thuringian parliament and triggering another debate on whether to ban the party outright.

  • Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    FINALLY. And to everyone who is like “tHiS wiLl MaKe ThInGs WorSe!!11” or “bAnNiNg ThE pArTy WoN’t hElP”. SHUT THE FUCK UP.

    These are LITERALLY Nazis. Even more than the US Trump-Rep’s.

    And since Russia is not willing to throw 25 Million People on them again and is much more keen to join them, since they are heavily involved with the AFD:

    -https://www.zdf.de/nachrichten/politik/deutschland/putin-afd-zusammenarbeit-100.html

    -https://www.zdf.de/nachrichten/politik/deutschland/petr-bystron-afd-russland-100.html

    -https://www.bundestag.de/dokumente/textarchiv/2024/kw15-de-aktuelle-stunde-russland-afd-997398

    -https://www.zeit.de/politik/deutschland/2024-04/afd-russische-regierung-strategiepapier

    I’m not willing to take any chance on that. We have Laws for EXACTLY this scenario, time for our government to grow a spine and starts protecting democracy!

    We did it once, we can do it again: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_Reich_Party

    • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think their party should be banned and all funds currently donated and accounts related should be redirected to counter facism efforts and education.

    • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      40
      ·
      2 months ago

      They banned NPD and AFD happened.

      All you’ll get is a new party filling up the political vacuum and their audience being even more die-hard radicals.

      In a democracy where some 30% vote nazi, banning them won’t solve anything. Anything.

      No, I won’t shut up, because you and people like you are part of the problem. If you think the solution is to jail and ban your political opponents, I got bad news for you.

  • lemonmelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    As an aside, I can’t be the only one annoyed by the choice to expand “AfD” to “Alternative for Germany” instead of “Alternative for Deutschland” right? I really think the best solution to this is that we all agree that AfD should fuck off into oblivion. Sound good? Great!

  • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 months ago

    Far-right parties’ main goal is excluding people from society so they should be fully okay when they’re the ones being excluded.

  • FrowingFostek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    So, for the sake of argument, if AfD is banned would they not just became a paramilitary group?

    What’s to stop them from devolving into something more ‘nefarious’ if they are stripped of political power?

    • JayObey711@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      What stoped the kpd? Or the groups that wanted to rebuild the NSDAP? Would you rather have them pull the strings instead? I mean yea a ban could be dangerous, but letting them take over the justice system, the finances and police of Germany seems like a horrible second option.

      • FrowingFostek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Oh I’m not advocating for letting them remain in a position of political influence.

        I’m asking what mechanisms beyond simply banning them will need to be implemented? I’m thinking banning them is only a bandage solution.

        • JayObey711@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Well there are mechanisms that should keep Nazis in check. Unfortunately these positions in the police and secret service are full of Nazis :). We’ll see

    • Jumi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m guessing they’d still be under observation after they get banned because of exactly that and I also think there’s steep step between political engagement and serious criminal activity.

      But that gets decided by a court and as a German I think the judiciary is the most trustworthy of the three powers. I think if it even comes to that they deal with the motion in a sensitive way.

      • FrowingFostek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I am not a German, so I appreciate you explaining that to me. As an American I’d love to say the same about our judiciary.

  • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Isn’t there a lot of dirt on them? Starting with pushing for more strict laws against foreign influence and funding, covert fascism, and then dragging them (and anybody else akin to them) through courts until they are non-existent is how it should have been done a long time ago imho. Just a cold, inorganic machine of beaurocracy grinding them into a ground meat without any possible objection due to biases.

  • daltotron@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    I mean I do think banning them is a good idea, and in general I think nazis should be taken on helicopter rides, most especially the enablers of nazis, their financial leash handlers which basically bootstrap them into these positions in order to push the dialogue further rightward in service of corporate interests, and probably also in this case in service of “geopolitical security” since we’re going to be seeing oncoming climate refugees in the coming years, and combatting that in any way but increasing the security apparatus is off the table.

    More than that, though, I worry that realistically just banning them, though a great temporary measure, won’t do much, say, five years or a decade down the road, because it’s not gonna solve the core hypocrisies and discrepancies that neoliberalism is not so keen to solve. If you want to actually solve this problem long term then you need to combat those core problems. Instead, though, I think that probably the party being banned will just see them either form a new party, or else tone down their rhetoric to an acceptable degree, or just join the next furthest right party and then decide to push them further right, and so on and so on, until we’ve all collectively just shifted rightward to an incredible degree.

    Ad nauseam, et cetera, regardless of the political apparatuses at work, until collectively the western world plummets towards fascism.

  • rustyfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    A ban is incredibly hard. Not impossible, but hard. And even if, it won’t solve the actual problem. The AfD maintained the image of a protest party and to this day people believe this crap. A great way to cut their votes in half would be educating the population so they understand that protest is good but voting for fascist scum is not.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    We, Germans, cannot allow 30 Jan 1933 to 08 May 1945 to repeat itself. Also, the communists in “Die Linke” can go straight to hell with the neo-Nazis.

    • JayObey711@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Fuck you trying to separate the left. That’s what happened last time and that’s what didn’t work last time.

  • doingthestuff@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    I feel like history could teach us something. How many times have banned ideologies thrived? A lot of people assume the party doing the silencing is in the wrong.

  • Siegfried@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    Too little, too late. You can’t ban a 30% party and expect democracy to hold.