At this point I’m very concerned about the open source industry relying so much on github. You have to remember that any project there can be swept away overnight because it doesn’t fit into the agenca of a large company, for example.

  • Anti-Face Weapon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    This kind of thing often has the opposite of the intended effect. People then host mirrors of the original repo, and the press brings more developers to the project.

    This sort of action by Nintendo and other companies is so short sighted. Bad press, a legal battle they couldn’t actually win if it went to court, increased attention on the thing they’re trying to hinder, etc. Its a stupid decision made by business people who don’t know anything about tech, and who are disincentivized to care about the long term health of their brand.

    I litterally had not heard of the emulator until now. Maybe I’ll have to compile it and give it a spin now.

    • Bitswap@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Bad press, a legal battle they couldn’t actually win if it went to court

      Those two seem like a stretch.

      • Anti-Face Weapon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is clearly bad press, everyone reading this gets negative thoughts about Nintendo. We are all talking about how bad they are RIGHT NOW.

        Nintendo would absolutely lose that legal battle. It’s well established that emulation is not a crime and nor is the development of emulators.

        • Bitswap@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          You already had negative thoughts about nintendo…so does that count? Most people won’t even see this…so I don’t think it’s much bad press.

          As for legal battles…being sued is not really about committing crimes…you can lose legal battles while not doing anything illegal. I think Nintendo would likely win from simply pushing the devs into bankruptcy…

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean, that’s been obvious since Microsoft bought it.

      But this is really more about how emulator devs ought to accept that Nintendo is going to try to persecute them and start keeping themselves anonymous to avoid being ruined by lawsuits, even though what they’re doing is neither illegal nor unethical.

      • PropaGandalf@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not necessarily. Look at Lemmy instances for example. You could call each instance a hub, but the content is pretty much distributed.

  • yamanii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    Nintendo is not as stupid as you guys think, Yuzu forks that actually got some development like sudachi got targeted shortly after and was dmca’d too, nobody wants to work on something that’s going to get claimed in 3 months.

    • mbirth@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Just serve the code locally from a Gitea or Forgejo instance. Then let’s see how Ninty is going to DMCA that. Also, I’d love for someone to challenge the DMCA’s as copyright should not apply to an emulator that doesn’t use any original code and doesn’t come with ROM files.

      • yamanii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, it’s why Nintendo got Yuzu through DRM circumvention since games are encrypted, if Ryujinx didn’t comply they would’ve just done the same.

        • mbirth@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          But nothing is circumvented. People have to provide their own keys, right? It’s like suing GnuPG b/c it can decrypt stuff…

          • n1ckn4m3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            IANAL, but from what I read regarding Yuzu / the title and prod keys / etc., is Nintendo’s argument is three-fold – the only way to obtain those keys is to use a tool that itself is a violation of the DMCA, use of those keys by an emulator to decrypt Nintendo’s protected content in a method outside of Nintendo’s authorized use is a violation of DMCA even if the keys aren’t provided in the emulator, and there is no legitimate use of those keys except to circumvent controls intended to protect copyright.

            Therefore, by their argument, any emulator that can use those keys would effectively be subject to DMCA even if you had to bring your own keys, because unless the emulator only ran homebrew or completely decrypted content and had absolutely no decryption capabilities, you’d still be using the prod keys and title keys to decrypt content in violation of the DMCA in order to execute it. So, the tool that dumps the keys is a DMCA violation and any emulator that uses those keys to decrypt protected content in order to execute it is a DMCA violation, and Nintendo has a strong case that the actual keys themselves are only useful for making unauthorized copies of content that bypass the encryption that exists to prevent it.

            It stands to reason that a clean-room developed Switch emulator that required all content it ran to be decrypted prior to being able to run it may be able to exist without Nintendo shitting it into non-existance, since Nintendo couldn’t make any argument that the primary use was a DMCA violation as no encryption would be being bypassed by the emulator. They’d probably then go after whoever made the tool to dump the games, but they’d probably be less successful.

            On the other hand, the pragmatist in me says that unless I was 500% sure of my online anonymity, I wouldn’t want to pick a fight with Nintendo – even if I thought I was right. They have enough money to lock someone up in legal battles for a very long time and most independent developers wouldn’t have anywhere near the finances required to bankroll appropriate defense counsel. Can’t say I’d blame people for not wanting to invite that hellscape into their lives.

            • mbirth@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 months ago

              Thing is, DMCA doesn’t apply all over the world. There are countries where whatever electronic device you buy is actually yours and you’re allowed to do whatever you want - including messing with the firmware. Also, I’d argue, the DMCA doesn’t apply if you dump the firmware/keys for yourself only without distributing it.

              That being said, it’s unfortunate that these people are mostly in the US where the party with more money decides when a lawsuit is over and not some sane judge that just throws this case back at Nintendo. But after the stuff with Disney+ and the recent one with Uber, I’m not surprised at all anymore.

  • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Nintendo youll never get my money cuz you wont me play yer great games on my own hardware. Ill never spend another dime on your designed to fail overpriced crappy controllers. Never! Boooooo!

  • logging_strict@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Wait! So the author bows his head, says hey great guys u win. Watch i complied.

    Leans over to the stranger sitting next to him and says, hold my beer.

    In the same heartbeat, creates another git acnt, exact same commit history. And carries on. Some other author, totally not the same guy but oddly the same pgp public key announces they’ve taken over and here are the new urls.

    i call that mission accomplished

    this comment thread is like fight Money Mcbags and go bankrupt for our entertainment and for the LOLs and feelz good?

    Or we can just post the new urls and pretend it’s a new maintainer, with the handle lawyerdisappointed

  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Repackaging old games for new consoles is basically the entire business model for Nintendo at this point. In light of that, I can see why they go after emulators so hard.