The first presidential debate is done and the aftermath has not been good for the incumbent, Joe Biden.

Some Democrat politicians and operatives reportedly texted CNN commentators with hopes that Mr Biden, 81, would step aside. Some floated the possibility of going to the White House and publicly stating concerns about him remaining as candidate.

But if Mr Biden were to drop out, it would be a free-for-all. There is no official mechanism for him or anyone else in the party to choose his successor, meaning Democrats would be left with an open (Democratic National Convention (DNC) in Chicago from August 19-22.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m honestly trying to think of who they could run this late and I’m coming up short. Gavin Newsom is terrible idea in my opinion. Like you said, AOC is too young. Kamala Harris? People hate her.

    • ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      The age specifics might be important. AOC turns 35 in October, before she’d take office if elected. And therefore might actually be eligible.

        • citrusface@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          There’s no battle to be had. You can be elected at 34 and you have to be 35 to serve. As long as you are 35 before inauguration, you are good. There is nothing to challenge. It’s cut and dry.

            • citrusface@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              In this case - it is.

              Article II, Section 1, Clause 5:

              No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

              There is NOTHING that prevents anyone from campaigning or running for president that is younger than 35. You have to be 35 to serve as president. There is no ambiguity.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                Dude, SCOTUS is currently deciding whether or not it’s legal for a president to assassinate his political rivals.

                • citrusface@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Okay - you know what. I yield. I shouldn’t have to in the first place, but I legitimately cannot argue your point.

    • Agreed, and agreed.

      Why not Klobuchar? She’s got some national recognition from the 2019/20 cycle, politics are acceptable to moderates, progressive (enough), and she’d eat Trump for lunch in debates and on social media. Plus, she’s from the Midwest, and might pick up some folks for regional loyalty, and could play against the “slick New Yorker” which might still work.

      The bases are going to vote party lines. I think undecideds and wavering moderates are the pick-up points, and I think Klobuchar could do that.

      I like Yang’s politics, but he’s got a popularity problem, and Buttigieg - Trump would just harp on his sexual orientation, and I’m not confident enough that America’s ready yet to vote for a gay president. Hell, we can’t even get a woman into office.

      IMO Klobuchar’s the safest bet against Trump.

      • njm1314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Trump won’t agree to a debate with a new candidate. I doubt that there be another debate at all as is.

        • For sure. But there will be a lot of indirect debate on social media, because Trump can’t keep his burger-hole shut, and Klobuchar’s free to murder him (metaphorically) on public platforms. Even if he only posts to TruthSocial, everything he says gets parroted on X and Facebook, and that’s still where the most eyeballs are.

          And old school public media picks this stuff up and repeats it - that’s mostly what they’ve been reduced to -but it still reaches a lot of eyes and ears.

          And: Trump refusing another debate, she could just hammer on his cowardice, over and over. That’d be a win.

          Klobuchar is tough. If nothing else, I’d love to see that fight. Only slightly less than I’d love to see an AOC v Trump fight; that’d be like watching a skinny junkie enter the MMA ring against Holly Holm. It’d be hilarious. But AOC is too young, and Trump will be either dead or in a home by the time she’s old enough to run. I just hope Bernie is still active enough by then to support her. I don’t know that she could get elected - she’s too polarizing - but it would be a marvelous spectacle.

          Anyway, I prefer Yang’s politics, and I’d be thrilled to see Buttigieg in the White House, but I stand by Klobuchar as the best bet.

          • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            AOC turns 35 before the election, so she’s eligible. She might be “too young” to vote for but not too young to run.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Klobuchar is definitely a good idea. Although I’m not convinced that replacing Biden this late in the game is going to save the presidency either. I don’t know what should be done.