The Oregon case decided Friday is the most significant to come before the high court in decades on the issue and comes as a rising number of people in the U.S. are without a permanent place to live.

The Oregon case decided Friday is the most significant to come before the high court in decades on the issue and comes as a rising number of people in the U.S. are without a permanent place to live.

    • sunzu@kbin.run
      0·
      5 months ago

      you only matter if you own property.

      While technically true… There is a difference between a guy owning a factory and a guy owning a home.

      They are not the same lol

      • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
        0·
        5 months ago

        This is pedantic and totally irrelevant to the topic of homeless having no place to simply exist.

        Unless of course you are trying to highlight the billions of unhoused factory owners?

        • sunzu@kbin.run
          0·
          5 months ago

          Point being “home owner” is a temporaly housed person ;)

          You got own right property to be part of the right class.

          Learn to read

            • sunzu@kbin.run
              0·
              5 months ago

              You can look at it like that…

              My value add here is clarifying detail was that was lost in that statement.

              I am not hurting the reader or the OP thesis, just adding to the body of work.

        • sunzu@kbin.run
          0·
          5 months ago

          Many people are few pay checks away from being homeless

          System works as intended

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      0·
      5 months ago

      Seems that way. Empowering local governments to determine legality will inevitably allow NIMBY to criminalize homelessness across the nation, with each city pointing fingers as the next.