• 0110010001100010@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    He wants it to go all the way to the supreme court so they can rule in his favor and further erode the separation of church and state. Fuck these assholes and this timeline…

    • exanime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Exactly right… what should happen is that the Satanic Church, any Islam denomination, the Spaghetti Monster, etc should all start putting up their own billboards everywhere…

      While SCOTUS is compromised, there is no point in playing their game

      • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Just a heads up The Satanic Temple are the righteous group that litigates all these radical zealots. They don’t believe in a literal Satan unlike the Church of Satan.

        • Granite@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Church of Satan is also atheistic, although some may believe in magic and other energy work. Either way, neither group literally worships Satan. You might be thinking of the Order of Nine Angles.

    • Weirdmusic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Honestly, I can’t see how SCOTUS could rule in his favour. The US constitution clearly states that there is a seperation between church and state. For SCOTUS to rule in his favour would require them overturning the constitution itself.

      • Butt Pirate@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Two things:

        1. Separation of Church and State is not codified into law

        And

        1. 1A specifically says “Congress shall pass no law respecting any religion”. They’ll say this law was passed by a state, not congress. Ipso facto, they rule in his favor.
        • eltrain123@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          The actual text concerning religion says that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;…”. It’s arguable that requiring publicly funding schools to display a specific religions moral code is establishing their religious views as a standard others must follow.

          The second part of that (prohibiting the free exercise thereof) is not affected. They are free to do whatever they want in their private homes and institutions. They just are not free to force those practices on others or other’s children. You don’t have the freedom to “exercise” if exercise means forcing your will on others. And anyone that thinks that should be the case is specifically calling to remove that constitutional freedom from our society.

          It’s un-American… by definition…

        • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          That whole “it only applies to Congress” angle is malarkey.

          303 Creative v. Elenis: The 1st Amendment bars Colorado from forcing businesses to provide service that goes against their religious beliefs.

          Shurtleff v. City of Boston: The City of Boston could not reject flying a Christian flag when it had open many other groups to fly different flags for various occasions.

          Kennedy v. Bremerton School District: A school board wrongfully terminated a coach for praying on the field.

          These are all recent cases too. Of course, that doesn’t mean they won’t find some different bullshit reason to say this is fine.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        The SCOTUS is thoroughly corrupt. We have three sitting justices who have been exposed as accepting bribes from parties with matters before the court, and we have two that are known to have committed perjury during their confirmation hearings.

        There is zero accountability or recourse. We no longer live in a country with a rule of law.