• Croquette@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Good thing we’re on lemmy.

    But it’s not whataboutism when we compare the two presidential candidates on their platform and actions.

    • mathemachristian@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Their username is redditwanderer which is why I referenced reddit and in debatebro terms arguing against the statement about joe biden not being “well intentioned” because he supports genocide by bringing up how trump is worse is whataboutism.

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      That’s interesting. Why does that standard change so much in the context of presidential candidates compared to every other situation?

      Like, if someone was criticizing, say, Fidel Castro, and instead of addressing it I brought up the problems with the Batista regime that he opposed, would that be whataboutism? Just as in a presidential election, there were two realistic possibilities, either Batista stays in power or he’s overthrown. So if it’s valid to divert from criticism of Biden towards problems with his most realistic alternative, Trump, then why would it not be valid to do the same thing with Castro and Batista, or any number of similar cases?

      • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        We are talking about a stance of two presidential candidates, the context matter when talking whataboutism.

        In this case, the stance of both candidates on Israel is part of their political platform and we’re in the presidential campaign.

        Whataboutism would be Republicans defending Trump on its criminal charge by talking about Hillary’s emails. Those two things are unrelated.