Ridley Scott explained how studios didn’t realize ‘The Martian’ was a comedy.

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      [Insert standard explanation about the worldwide decline in media literacy here]

  • Sumocat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a farce: “a light dramatic composition marked by broadly satirical comedy and improbable plot”. It’s played straight. The stakes are serious. It should be a tragedy. But then there’s a literal turning point when they turn around to rescue Watney, and it’s ridiculous.

    • cynar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The book makes it make a lot more sense. He actually reasons through what he is doing, and why. The line “I’m going g to science the shit out of it” is practically the mantra, and demonstrated again and again.

      The film basically takes this and strips out all the ‘boring science’ stuff. What’s left, while still a good film, is a shadow of the source material.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    The book is hard sci-fi and excellent.

    The movie is dumb shit and screwy. The only way this change of tone and content is justified is by realizing that they switched genres and turned it into a movie.