• riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    13 days ago

    Can I just send you five years worth of „we’re sorry we’re behind schedule” messages and then ghost you instead? If so send me $159

  • Kajika@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    13 days ago

    yet an other hardware from 10+ years ago. here we have an ARM Cortex-A53 from what it seems to be 2012. Maybe it is actually compatible with OpenGL 3…

    • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      Our beloved consoles from the 80s and 90s were built with off the shelf parts, this is no different. Custom hardware in a niche market would lead nowhere.

  • Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    12 days ago

    I wonder who this is made for?

    The article calls it a “smartphone sized pocket computer”, but that describes smartphones too; they already are pocket computers. And they’ve had decades of design and development behind them.

    So… This device has a tiny touchscreen, and a keyboard, rather than having the whole thing being a touchscreen. So instead it has a modular bottom half… Which… Sounds like it’s trying to solve a problem that would’ve been a problem in like… The 90s, maybe, but has been solved by using… A touchscreen that can change the type of input it is flexibly, like smartphones do.

    It can’t call, like a smartphone, despite being a smartphone sized device. It has USB A 2.0 sockets and an Ethernet socket… Which makes it once again sound incredibly out-dated, like a device found in a time capsule, because USB C is smaller and faster than USB A 2.0, and can potentially be used for damn near anything. Which includes connecting to the Internet.

    Its battery looks very weak. Its CPU looks very weak. It has a tiny amount of RAM, and a tiny amount of storage. It is outclassed by any affordable, midrange smartphone, at nearly the same price too (if you avoid big brand names).

    • EmilieEvans@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      This device has a tiny touchscreen, and a keyboard, rather than having the whole thing being a touchscreen.

      That’s awesome. I still miss my Blackberry Passport (keyboard and large 1:1 screen).

      • Tattorack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        12 days ago

        Tiny keyboards were a nightmare. There’s a reason why the Blackberry failed. You might like it, but then you’re part of a minority.

        • EmilieEvans@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          Wide display: perfect for reading A4 documents

          keyboard: nicer to type. Also, the passport was as wide as, well … , a passport so it is a pretty decently sized keyboard which isn’t comparable to the tiny Q10.

          The passport was never meant to be a generic for the masses device. It is a beautiful specialized tool.

    • mostlikelyaperson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      For people who like a concept more than practicality. There’s maybe a handful use cases that this specific device fits in that isn’t covered better by existing tech, but I guarantee if that thing actually gets kickstarted and arrives severely delayed in several years, it’ll show up in a couple YouTube videos with people sort of uncertain what to use it for, and in the vast majority of cases it’ll end up in some drawers after having been used a few hours tops.

      • Tattorack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 days ago

        My thoughts exactly. I’ve seen several such devices already, probably the most expensive and over-designed one being the Apple VR, and it’s always the same story.

  • Riley@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    A little worried that with swapping those components like that, it’s trying to be too many things for too many different groups of people instead of one exact thing.

    I think all I really want is something shaped like this with a keyboard, like an old Blackberry that could be used as a terminal.

  • Solrac@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    13 days ago

    3gb RAM? 32gb emmc? This feels a bit like a raspberry pi project. Up the specs at least 6gb to at least no[t look like yet another microdeck with emulators, please… I like the concept, but as is, it leaves plenty to be desired

  • plm00@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    13 days ago

    I’m intrigued. And although I read the article, I’m not entirely sure who or what this is for. It’s cool, but… what?

    • MIDItheKID@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      Funny story. LG made something with a similar concept about 10 years ago and it never really took off. The LG G5 was a modular smart phone that was supposed to have a bunch of cool modules, but they never came to fruition.

      I had one, but mostly because I loved having a swappable battery. Never had to charge my phone, I would just have a spare battery charging on my desk and I would swap it out before I left the house.

  • heavy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    13 days ago

    Sorry, if it sounds too good to be true, it usually is. If you can’t make this stuff at scale, no way you could sell it at $160 a unit.

  • dink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    I feel like it’s almost too generic to be useful. All the “standard” attachments make it a thing that already exists (and those things are usually much stable and supported). If they get enough 3rd party attention prior to launch, that could change.

    I wish they would have spent the time and effort just committing to the smartphone idea. Linux and the Linux community could greatly benefit from more open source smartphone devices.

  • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    13 days ago

    I’m intrigued simply because it’s not Android but the keyboard and gamepad are better done with existing products like the click keyboard and Gamesir.

  • mesamune@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    13 days ago

    I like the form factor, but seeing the issues with supply on hackberrypi and uconsole, im hoping they dont have the same issue. Lots of people like that form factor (including myself).