• Caveman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think people should need a licence to drive anything that has a tall nose. The chance of fatality is really high for those cars and people need to be taught that.

    • Jarix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      If it doesnt have airbrakes, and you remove enough seats, you are legally allowed to drive a school bus with a normal liscence.

      We need a LOT of attention to liscensing for different types of vehicles beyond just these trucks

    • Demdaru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Iiiiiidiot tax! $99,99 for 2 hour course where people tell you “You see that hood? Yeah, you hit someone with it, that person is GONE”.

      • Caveman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I just want to put a small barrier between people and buying a car that’s may more dangerous than any reasonably sized alternative. If people want storage space they should buy a station wagon. If they want to transport for work they should buy a Caddy type. If they want to go outdoors offroading then they should get a licence on how to drive offroad and how to prevent front-over accidents etc.

        SUVs and bigger cars are becoming the default choice and I think that’s a bad thing.

    • bitwolf@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yep these big rigs should require a CDL, enough with the light trick exemption