jeffw@lemmy.worldM to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agoBiden has officially appointed more judges than Trumpwww.motherjones.comexternal-linkmessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up1166arrow-down111
arrow-up1155arrow-down1external-linkBiden has officially appointed more judges than Trumpwww.motherjones.comjeffw@lemmy.worldM to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square10fedilink
minus-squarecaveman8000@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year agoWhy don’t we just take the whole “appointment of judges” away. Why are we not electing judges?
minus-squareusernamesAreTricky@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 year agoDirect popular vote judge elections have their own set of issues - at the very least for lower courts For instance, they tend to lead towards judges issuing out harsher penalties when campaigning than they normally would to appear “'tough on crime”
minus-squared00phy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoLook who the electorate just chose to run the country. You want them selecting judges too!? It’s slightly better the way it is since there’s at least some oversight.
Why don’t we just take the whole “appointment of judges” away. Why are we not electing judges?
Direct popular vote judge elections have their own set of issues - at the very least for lower courts
For instance, they tend to lead towards judges issuing out harsher penalties when campaigning than they normally would to appear “'tough on crime”
Look who the electorate just chose to run the country. You want them selecting judges too!? It’s slightly better the way it is since there’s at least some oversight.