• Sludgeyy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Fear of losing basic income is a great crime deterrent.

    Are you going to steal from that gas station if you could lose your basic monthly check for 20+ years?

    You think kids would drive drunk if you told them that if they were caught, they would lose their basic income for life? Most think it’s a slap on the wrist, maybe some community service, IF they get caught.

      • Clent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Losing it for life is too drastic and isn’t what any behavior specialist would suggest.

        There needs to be a path to earn it back. For example, hours of community service based on the offense and that increase with each offense.

        It would also want to incentivize future legislatures excluding people by targeting groups. The drug war and its imbalance towards treatment of minorities as an example.

      • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Y’all realize what you’re describing is just a poor tax, right? Anyone with significantly higher income over base income would…just break the law anyway.

        If we’re talking using money to deter crimes, it needs to be a sliding scale. You’re a millionaire and got a speeding ticket? That’ll be $50,000.

        • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Aw dang it, we are only allowed to use one punishment as a country so I guess you are right. Maybe we could like, lock the rich people that commit crimes in a small room with a bed and a toilet.