Basically nvidia shadowplay for linux

  • yamanii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I don’t get it why people care so much about this, your AMD and Nvidia cards already did it for years, are they all deck users?

    • vithigar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      There are two factors.

      First is simply the convenience of having it all built in to the gaming platform you’re using instead of juggling other software. Plus Steam will host content you want to share for you, which neither AMD nor Nvidia does. Also, neither AMD nor Nvidia’s offering providers a two hour rolling recording that you can just skim through and pick clips from at your leisure.

      Second is the hope for better reliability. Shadowplay/replay/whatever nvidia is calling it now just stops working at random for a lot of people, myself included, with no warning or indication until you hit the “save replay” button and get a popup telling you that its not running. I also wrestled for a while with it recording the wrong screen when I had two monitors, so I’d just get clips of my second monitor desktop with the audio of the game. There are lots of people hoping that Steam will manage better.

      • yamanii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Shadow play automatically turns off when you open KeePass or Netflix, but it doesn’t turn on again after you are done, very annoying yes.

        What will make or break steam’s version is if it’s so light that even people with weak hardware can record fine.

        • vithigar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’ve seen initial reports that at least on Steam Deck it’s far less impactful than any other recording solution available so far (decky recorder/obs/whatever). Like you though I’m interested to see a detailed look at how it does on a standard Windows gaming PC though, where you’ve already got well established low impact solutions like Shadowplay or Relive.

    • Muscar@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Many are, yes. But for some like me who play via cloud streaming where at least Nvidia stops that function, it’s a great thing. It’s also nice to have it all in one place, most people already use Steams screenshot function so having this too is just nice. This has been a commonly requested feature for a long time, it’s only weird that it has taken so long for it to exist.

    • MaliciousKebab@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      No but I fucking hate geforce experience and the fact that I need to have an Nvidia account to use the features of my hardware. Now I can remove that garbage app from my pc, thanks Valve.

  • RetroSoul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is pretty great! I’m interested to see how the quality will compare with my OBS replay buffer settings. One of the best things is that it’s coming to Steam Deck! Mostly excited to see how well this works on Linux.

    • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I imagine they made this specifically for Steam Deck, since windows users already have stuff like this built into GPU software. They’d want to offer feature parity on their handheld, so it’ll probably work nicely out of the box.

  • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is why Steam is as popular as it is, they just release features that people like. Sure GOG doesn’t have DRM and Epic Games gives a bigger share to developers but Steam gives players what they actually want.

    • jrgd@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      GOG has DRM for many titles: see Galaxy. As I understand it, it isn’t as pervasive as Steam, but is necessary if you want multiplayer on many titles or care about extras like achievements.

      • LwL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Achievements or multiplayer matching not being implemented in the game itself isn’t on GOG. They still allow you to download and launch any game you’ve bought, without even requiring galaxy.

        Also lesser known is the fact that there are DRM-free games on steam. Download them once, you can play without having steam running or even installed. Using a client to download isn’t inherently DRM either.

      • PoopMonster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Cloud sync also requires the drm, but the advantage that gog and itch have over steam is that for most games you just get the executables and you’re good to go.

        • jrgd@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Tbf to cloud sync, nothing is stopping you from using your own backup/restore service with your drm-free titles compared to the other features that Galaxy offers.

          • littlecolt@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            You can also use a third party launcher. I use Lutris on Linux. The GOG Integration is excellent.

    • callouscomic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Steams custom controller profiles alone used on Steam Deck are killers for me. Nothing else amounts.

      • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Steaminput is a massive deal, it supports gyro, remapping, profiles, and extensive customization. XInput can’t compare and the epic games store relies on developers for everything. That’s the reason why I will always pick a Steam Controller over an Xbox controller.

        • uis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          XInput can’t compare

          XInput is X11 API and SteamInput can be used through SDL or directly.

          • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I wish, the first one still stands as the best controller imo but it still has so much that can be improved (USB C, dual thumbsticks and trackpads, two back paddles, improved haptics, better gyro, better ergonomics, etc).

            • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              I want them to launch a Deck v2, Controller v2, and a new take on the Steam Machine simultaneously with a goal of knocking Xbox out of the market and replacing them as the third console. A new Steam Machine right now would play all of Xbox’s exclusives on day one and some of Sony’s.

              • orgrinrt@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                I bet my right testicle that the very reason Sony and others have started bringing console ports to steam, is that steam has promised not to compete in the same space. Or something like that. Otherwise removing all those from steam is just something that’ll probably happen if they do enter the market again.

                Then again, Steam Deck is a little bit in that direction. So perhaps not.

                • bitwaba@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  I think Sony wants out of the physical console market. They just don’t know how to do it. The consoles are sold at a loss, but the games sales are massive returns on investments.

                  If they can double their sales by releasing on steam at the cost of 30% per sale, they still come out ahead, and can save all the R&D cost on developing a physical console, plus the loss from each individual console sale.

  • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    If my screen recorder software doesn’t put an “UNREGISTERED HYPERCAM 2” watermark at the top left corner, then I’m completely uninterested, smh

  • Vash63@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Awesome. OBS has never prioritized Linux performance, curious how this will compare.

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      To be honest, OBS is way more advanced than a screen recording tool. It’s basically a live program director

  • Zozano@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s hilarious to me that Epic will never introduce features like this, and also complain Steam has a monopoly, as if they’re at all comparable

    • DragonOracleIX@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Steam does have a monopoly though. They don’t do anything anti-competitive with it, so there is not much Epic can do about it (other than make their platform better for the people using it).

      • Zozano@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Just for the sake of being fair, Steam does do one thing which is anticompetitive; they require publishers don’t sell their games for less than they do on Steam.

        If you think about this for a moment you’ll realise it’s in the publisher’s best interest to agree to this.

        • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Not quite true - they require that you not sell Steam keys for less than you do on Steam. They still don’t even stop you from doing giveaways or participating in bundles. It’s just that your typical prices on independent Steam key sales, for which they don’t even take a cut, can’t be lower than Steam prices. Also the seller sets all of these prices.

          Given they’re footing the bill for indefinitely hosting the games supplied via those keys, that’s an entirely reasonable restriction.

          This is coming from someone who is against capitalism and all IP law. The big problem with Steam imho is that Gabe Newell won’t live forever and when he’s gone the company could go public or go to some fail son who will tank it. I’m not even saying Gabe Newell is a great guy or an ethical billionaire, but he’s been remarkably consistent in keeping Steam’s business model running well.

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Steam does not have a monopoly by any actual definition of monopoly, though. A) Mobile gaming makes up the most of all video gaming revenue. B) On PC the most revenue is made by games that aren’t even on Steam in the first place (Minecraft, Fortnite, Roblox). Steam’s 2023 revenue has been estimated to be around 8.6bn USD out of 45bn USD of PC gaming revenue. That’s barely a 5th of the market power. By no account this can be actually considered to be a monopoly.

        https://www.visualcapitalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/50-Years-of-Video-Game-Revenue-Dec-30.jpg

        • Jestzer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I love this graphic because it’s a reminder to self-proclaimed “gamers” that mobile gaming has been doing laps around “real” gaming for over half a decade now, with no indication of the trend changing. Yes, mobile games are typically lower quality and more predatory, but it’s undeniable that the average person who plays video games now is just a regular person with a phone.

          • Scrollone@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yes, but… it’s like comparing people that go to the cinema and people who watch reels on Instagram.

            Okay, both things involve watching a video, but they are two very different experiences.

          • daddy32@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            This is by revenue, so whales succumbing to mobile bullshit may distort it - a lot.

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        No it doesn’t

        A company can be a monopoly when they include so many features that new competition can’t compete

      • tb_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        But how does the EGS exist?

        Because they are able to subsidize it with investor as well as Fortnite money. I doubt it’s turned a profit for them.

        Wouldn’t exactly call that “viable competition”

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          EGS is the Fortnite launcher. Fortnite’s player base is insanely huge. Those people have EGS installed, they just choose not to buy anything else on that platform, except maybe V Bucks.

          PS: The installed base of the Microsoft Store and Xbox apps are even bigger because Microsoft is allowed to bundle those with Windows.

        • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          That’s the thing that gets me. Undercutting is the quintessential anticompetitive practice, and it’s Epic’s entire business model. They give away games for free because they are trying to siphon some of Steam’s customers. They make exclusive release deals with publishers because they want to force people to use their platform. They are trying to compete with Steam using their resources from the success of Fortnite and Unreal rather than compete with the storefront by actually having a better storefront.

          • lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Are they succeeding? I have no idea of the actual figures and the Internet tends to form echo chambers, so I don’t know if the sentiments I read that they’re still not much of a threat are actually representative.

            • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Based on the fact that I’ve literally never heard anybody actually like the epic games store, I don’t think they’re successful

          • Zozano@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            One of the problems Epic has is that it is only a store front. Steam is a fully featured platform.

            Epic, in their lawsuit, wants to break Steam’s store and platform into separate applications, so they can compete.

            Sort of like how people want to have different app stores on their iphones.

            Difference is: Steam has no restrictions in the first place. You can add non-Steam games to the client if you want. You can use Proton if you want.

            Steam offers all of these features for free. What is the point in breaking them apart.

            • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              That’s what all users want

              You can add non-Steam games to the client if you want.

              Oh so it’s not a store, it’s just a launcher like Heroic…wait no, it’s still a problem

              Any client should be able to implement part of steam into it and any part of steam should be a standalone company

            • uis@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Most important difference: Steam isn’t the only way to install apps. Even on Steam Deck.

        • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          That’s easy to explain. EGS managed to make everyone hate them just as it started. How do they expect to be profitable if they piss off the entire market?

          There are other stores such as GoG that have actual users.

  • Toes♀@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Any information on if this tool separates game audio from other applications?