Are all American “debates” like this? The moderators just let them rattle off lies and skip the questions without challenging them?
Are all American “debates” like this? The moderators just let them rattle off lies and skip the questions without challenging them?
I’m not a developer. Just explaining why projects keep within their scope and don’t bloat their software with features, which in turn take more effort to maintain.
Hadn’t heard of that! I doubt many others have either.
Ugh and then CDPR used a genre as a name for their game, tarnishing it.
They have their scope. It’s a video transcoder. Programs are better suited to doing their job well rather than stretching themselves thin with loads of features.
It works pretty well, but kind of barebones at the moment, a lack of advanced audio and video settings lets it down.
The timeline feature is great though, being able to easily watch back your gameplay in real-time as it records.
They need support for multiple audio tracks, other codecs, resolution options, framerate options, different bitrate options. Also recording to memory absolutely needs to be an option so I’m not wearing down my disk by constantly writing to it.
Being in either beta gives you access to this. It’s right there on the webpage.
Is this why everyone is antisocial online now? Nobody talks in games anymore :(
I imagine downvoting incorrect answers being pretty useful in this type of community, it’s nothing personal and as you said, it doesn’t mean anything. Though just not upvoting would be sufficient.