Same thing as Harris trying to cater to MAGA with anti-immigrant rhetoric and all that. They already hate her, so it doesn’t win them over, but alienates the followers.
Same thing as Harris trying to cater to MAGA with anti-immigrant rhetoric and all that. They already hate her, so it doesn’t win them over, but alienates the followers.
Honestly, it’s between the UI and the chat feature. And the fact it’s at least slightly tied to your identity. And selling on Craigslist being kind of clunky still. They could probably make up the difference if they tried.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Scrolling back up, not sure I read your first comment correctly, but it does still apply. A politician is charged with doing the right thing (as if they ever actually do), not following their emotional desires. It’s unclear if you meant “the people who voted for a fascist felon” in terms of the public at large or just the Trump voters, though that applies either way (I know, we don’t like being merciful to bad people). I do think encouraging retribution, at the expense of the wellbeing of a society, is actively harmful, I don’t think that’s ethical, which is what I was pointing out about your comment, not trying to discredit your argument by saying you’re being hypocritical, which is what “tu quoque”/“whataboutism” would actually be. Now, you responding to my comment saying, “well OP/the artist have their politics dictated by emotion”, that is a perfect example of whataboutism, because instead of acknowledging or even examining the criticism, you’re just saying the same thing is true about someone else. So no, what I said was not more “whataboutism” then your statement.
I really don’t like this thing on social media where somebody will make a completely incorrect argument and then it’s like there’s an expectation placed on you to go back and point out all the problems with what they said. Can we literally get like, just the basic mechanics of logic out of the way? Having to spend time establishing this shit is insane.
Sounds like “whataboutism”/“tu quoque” to me.
Removed by mod
Let’s blame everyone for everything they did wrong. Blaming people who did nothing before you blame the actual Trump voters is literally insane.
Do your emotional desires dictate your politics? Or do you have an ethical system that does that? If so, why didn’t your ethical system preclude you from writing that comment?
Again - what the hell kind of integrity is that? Even if it’s going to be thrown out, you push towards the finish line.
Removed by mod
He categorically did not do the job. It’s not done.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Why not? He folded up everything as soon as the election was over. What the hell kind of integrity is that?
Removed by mod
Some people watch that and just take the cue and believe it. This is what brainwashing looks like.