I can easily imagine someone saying this unironicaly

Oof owch owie

Modus Tollens

Although I’ve been pointing at these numbers as well, it’s worth noting that the effects of the electoral college is still important.

Dem votes were up in PA and GA from 2020. Maybe other swing states as well, haven’t looked. Trump’s just went up more.

Either way, I think all of the brilliant minds who decided to withhold their votes for Kamala for whatever reason maybe weren’t being very pragmatic given the reality of the binary outcome set.

“No but see I withheld my vote for Kamala because I don’t feel she earned it”

Appreciate that excess production of 2000L of breast milk would require the amount of excess caloric intake of 2 years worth of normal adult consumption. With grocery prices being what they are, that’s something.

I think a lot of Americans don’t understand that the USA hedgemony isn’t a divine right, it was a deliberate construction with tacit agreement of convenience from the western world.

Much like an economy, belief makes it so.

Much like the UK’s arrogance has driven them into geopolitical obscurity, so will the USA’s.

In 15 years, Americans are going to wake up and realize that their voices are irrelevant in the world. I don’t know how y’all are going to handle it.

Ziggurat.

This guy is the definition of “if your only tool is a hammer, every problem will look like a nail”.

“Leftist Tyranny”.

Considering he asked twitter programmers to print out their pull requests Im not even sure he’s not cosplaying a programmer

Yeah. I mean, I understand the premise, I just think it’s flawed. Like, you and I as vehicle operators use two cameras when we drive (our two eyes). It’s hypothetically sufficient in terms of raw data input.

Where it falls apart is that we also have brains which have evolved in ways we don’t even understand to consume those inputs effectively.

But most importantly, why aim for parity at all? Why NOT give our cars the tools to “see” better than a human? I want that!

If you watch the video, the deer was standing on a strip of off coloured pavement, and also had about the same length as the dotted line. Not sure how much colour information comes through at night on those cameras.

The point here isn’t actually “should it have stopped for the deer” , it’s “if the system can’t even see the deer, how could it be expected to distinguish between a deer and a child?”

The calculus changes incredibly between a deer and a child.

Each of them only does it once, and thinks it’s just a matter of luck when it happens to someone else

Lol old Lemmy users chizzed

Yeah I got a pretty nauseating explanation of “The June 4th Incident”

I realize I didn’t explicitly say that, and that in the politically charged environment it was probably assumed I was shilling R.

I love data sets, that’s all.

Hoover and Roosevelt really drag the averages around.

The way they calculated, almost half of the “credit” for Democrat growth was Roosevelt.

And hoover single handedly cuts the R number by 30% as a result of him having massive negative growth.