They hate us cuz they ain’t us

Would there still be oil under russian soil after nuclear war?

what if my boss is a mere hectomillionaire?

So MAGA is not the side I would take in a civil war, even if I were an American, however: “Experience has shown that attacks against tanks with close combat weapons by a sufficiently determined man will basically always succeed.”

Look at the early stages of the Ukraine war Russia had in many heavy equipment categories a 5:1 superiority, Ukraine had comparitively few Tanks/AFVs/Aircrafts/Artillery/etc… yet still held it’s own in no small part due to trenchlines of conventional boot-on-floor infantry men, mines, cheap drones, shoulder launched atgms and good motivation/organisation.

tritium is probably slightly harder to sell to cousin yuri than motor oil

why are you defining imperialism as the export of capital and not, idk, the use of force against other nations?

aren’t marxist-leninists supposed to be against all empire?

and are the enlightened centrists in the room with us now?

Would you like to place bets on the chance of there being a 2028 election? I won’t even ask for 1:100000 odds, I’ll happily accept 1:100

Except for the fact these are about as different as any two cruise missiles can be

I dislike the framing of this, specifically:

“When we extend tolerance to those who are openly intolerant the tolerant ones end up being destroyed”

Implies that the intolerant are guarenteed victory. I vehemently disagree that this is true, and therefore would argue tolerating the bad actors is often a necessary evil to ensure that good actors are not unjustly censored. The risk of ‘another hitler’ is accepted this way of course but unless we as a society can demonstrate (if at all) that risk would be mitigated by the censorship of hate speech we have no good cause.

thank mr skeltal

Hot