• davidagain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yeah, but you don’t have more than two options for president of the united states. You have the one supporting unions and the weird racist loony hater one. Anyone suggesting something else might happen this year is lying to you.

  • Deestan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    In real, actionable, practical terms: What is the alternative you propose people choose, that will reduce the likelyhood of a fascist government right now at this election?

    • AnarchoNoAdjective@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      First past the post voting in a two party system gives you a 99.9999% likelihood of a facist government this election IMHO The only practical action to enact change seems to be a mass general strike.

      • Ummdustry@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Would you like to place bets on the chance of there being a 2028 election? I won’t even ask for 1:100000 odds, I’ll happily accept 1:100

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Congrats for destroying your credibility with “both sides” bullshit.

        Meanwhile, back in factual reality, the Democrats aren’t fascist and have more than a 0.00001% chance of winning.

      • Deestan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s a shit voting system. But the election is happening. How to effect a mass general strike large enough to change the voting system and introduce a new candidate with a chance of winning within two months?

        Because that is needed in order to safely tell people not to vote.

        • AnarchoNoAdjective@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Do both? I’m not saying don’t vote I’m saying the impact of voting is not enough to enact substantial change in policy.

  • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Just make sure you don’t get authoritarian bourgeois sneaking into positions of power during the chaos like they tend to do.

  • Ekybio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Vote Blue no matter who

    THEN we can think about changing something. Cant run if you never learned to walk after all…

    • umbrella@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      …THEN we wait 4 more years to vote again for another dissapointing politician.

      • redempt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        this is the most pro union ticket in decades. if you want progress, the path is collective labor power. it’s how we won the weekend and the 40 hour work week. it’s how we won paid lunch breaks (which are now being lost in many places). it’s how we earned paid maternity and paternity leave. if you want things to get better and stay better, join a union, STRIKE and just keep building coalition and class consciousness.

        • umbrella@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          nothing pro union about union busting for the last 4 years.

          and probably the next 4 if you aint naive to believe campaign promises from a career politician.