Nope. Here is a reaction of the maker of the video (iAnnet on X). iAnnet explains in the image below. Note that this movie was used by the Israeli embassy in USA to claim these nicely behaving, innocent football supporters were attacked. Subsequently all mainstream media copied it from there.
His intelligence is insufficient to have him realise that he should not react to remarks of the father of a driver.
Absolutely. LeClerc was fined €5000 (+€5000 suspended) for using profanity outside the track. Profanities are now more severely punished than illegally driving on a track while stewards and a driver are walking around.
Yesterday a team provisionally earned €30,000,000. A fine of €50,000 is a joke when compared to rewards like that. If touching a competitor’s car provides information that makes you win races, it is absolutely worth it. See https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/the-mercedes-rear-wing-marks-behind-red-bulls-suspicions/6799537/ and https://www.racefans.net/2021/11/13/verstappen-fined-e50000-as-stewards-rule-he-did-no-direct-harm-touching-hamiltons-rear-wing/
Norris created a potential dangerous situation for Stewards, much worse than a sporting advantage.
Of course it does not make sense. It was a reference to what Max said, and I added a smiley.
Formula 1 has become a joke. If a driver would do the same in a karting championship, they would be instantaneously disqualified.
Norris has the right passport 😜
Could be a heavy punishment for Lando. With stewards on track there was a potential danger which should result in penalty.
No, Michael!!! No!!
Formula 1 is loosing its credits in my book. Another shitshow with Herbert in the steward’s office.
There is a linguistic mistake here, or is it actually what they did?
The Stewards do not consider that this breach reached the same level as the most recent case…
Did they mean:
The Stewards considered that this breach did not reach the same level as the most recent case…
I would not be surprised if they need two new drivers at RBR soon.
The Stewards do not consider that this breach reached the same level as the most recent case and as such chose to levy a fine of €10,000 with €5,000 suspended pending no repeat within 12 months.
Ridiculous argumentation. They should have considered the opposite: “competitor has not learned from previous case and will get double the penalty”
But it would be even better if they would stick their heads in the Arabian desert sand and shut the fuck up with this completer and utter bs.
If I can’t avoid it or if I’m in a hurry, I will take Paracetamol 500mg. If there is no change within an hour, I’ll take Ibuprofen 600mg. But if I have time, I will get some rest (avoid bright light, close eyes and listen to podcasts).
He got a serious warning last week, but he did not learn from it. This will cost him badly, next year Norris will drive nr 1. Maybe that will be a lesson for him.
Can’t bake, ingredients repositories are not signed.
Were there any teams that followed the recommended/predicted tyre strategies?
All the toppers did one-stops, which were not on the list. How about further down?
If they are role models, they should stop going to countries that are misogynistic and violent, like SA. F*ck off with this hypocritical bs. “5 years old” mwahaha.
Saudi Arabia: Grand Prix must not deflect attention from dismal human rights record
A bit different situation as this benefitted Ferrari as well: September 17, 2023, Singapore: Sainz (Ferrari) kept Norris (Zak’s McLaren) within DRS range which allowed Norris to defend against Hamilton better.
Wholesome? He is a sleezy politician. In Mexico they know he is using Checo and the F1 camera’s for his own promotion. I have heard a bit about his political views, but not enough, it may be better if Mexicans explain.
I hope there are some Mexicans here to clarify?