The Stewards do not consider that this breach reached the same level as the most recent case and as such chose to levy a fine of €10,000 with €5,000 suspended pending no repeat within 12 months.
Ridiculous argumentation. They should have considered the opposite: “competitor has not learned from previous case and will get double the penalty”
But it would be even better if they would stick their heads in the Arabian desert sand and shut the fuck up with this completer and utter bs.
Ridiculous argumentation. They should have considered the opposite: “competitor has not learned from previous case and will get double the penalty”
But it would be even better if they would stick their heads in the Arabian desert sand and shut the fuck up with this completer and utter bs.
There is a linguistic mistake here, or is it actually what they did?
Did they mean: