I’m so confused. If Linux uses less RAM at idle than Windows, wouldn’t it be better choice for systems with low RAM?
I’m so confused. If Linux uses less RAM at idle than Windows, wouldn’t it be better choice for systems with low RAM?
This is an issue with browsers, not Linux. RAM usage will be lower on Linux than on Windows.
The Miata and the BRZ/GR86 aren’t fast though.
I remember them tasting good but being hard like rubber.
Nobody give him the keys to his 2005 Honda Civic
“Just one more highway bro, the 413 will fix it this time”
I can’t even afford to use the last one they made.
I wonder if the injury rate involving TVs has dropped noticeably from the transition from CRT to LCD to LED.
Twitch plays comic books.
This looks like a scene from Portal.
The comic that needed it’s own press release.
It still runs decently, I often forget it’s a 10 year old machine. I boot Ubuntu on it for work though, and boot Windows on it for the occasional game. It’s a useful machine.
This ain’t pretty boss
Dude’s been through some stuff, that’s for sure.
It’s a Rocket Bunny bodykit.
I prefer open eye cry emoji myself.
This is hilarious, thanks for sharing!
This post and this community is weird. All these posts are created by one person. Imagine hating something that’s given away for free.
The colours have been exceptionally magnificent this year in Ontario.
For some use cases, yes those would be better choices. Since your original post talks about “breathing new life” I’m assuming we’re talking about computers that are too old to recieve Windows updates or are too slow to be used with bloated Windows. In those cases, instead of throwing the device out, installing Linux is a good choice since it has lower RAM requirements, allowing you to open more browser tabs.