• madthumbs@lemmy.worldOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    ItS nOt LiNuX fAuLt! - Yeah, the rest of the world is just moving to fast for them.

    • DannyBoy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’m so confused. If Linux uses less RAM at idle than Windows, wouldn’t it be better choice for systems with low RAM?

      • madthumbs@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        Wouldn’t an android phone be a better choice? Wouldn’t an older air-gapped Windows version be a better choice? Wouldn’t using a Library computer be a better choice? Wouldn’t a type-writer be a better choice? Wouldn’t going out and making some money for something better be a better choice?

        • DannyBoy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          For some use cases, yes those would be better choices. Since your original post talks about “breathing new life” I’m assuming we’re talking about computers that are too old to recieve Windows updates or are too slow to be used with bloated Windows. In those cases, instead of throwing the device out, installing Linux is a good choice since it has lower RAM requirements, allowing you to open more browser tabs.