• OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I don’t use it that way. There are plenty of people I disagree with who aren’t libs. But in this case I was talking about a specific group of conspiracy theorists who are active on Lemmy who are, general speaking, libs.

    • xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      “generally speaking” as in “I pulled this stat out of my ass”

      Calling you a russian bot isn’t exactly a liberal policy, is it?

      If your reasoning for determining someone is “a lib” is saying that, then that’s exactly how you’re using the term.

      The fact you immediately assumed I was a capitalist is a pretty compelling argument that you’re not good at determining people’s ideologies based on their unrelated complaints about your bad takes

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        This may come as a surprise to you, but there are plenty of people who I disagree with who don’t baselessly accuse everyone they disagree with of being Russian bots. There happens to be a shit ton of overlap between liberals and people who subscribe to that particular conspiracy theory.

        I called you a supporter of capitalism because you objected to criticism of supporters of capitalism. You can identify how you please, but if you quack, I’m gonna assume you’re a duck. Doesn’t mean I accuse everyone of being ducks.