• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Pretty much any ex British colony is heavily biased against darker skin tones, America, India, Israel, it happened to pretty much all of them

    For India specifically it’s more a continent than a country. There’s a bunch of different ethnic groups lumped together, and for most of its history it was never unified. Then the Brits decided they’re all Indian and combined them because that makes corruption easier.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s honestly not very unified today. Their national languages are Hindi and English, yet only 55% of the population consider Hindi to be their first or second language. In fact, I asked my coworker from S. India where Hindi is pretty rare, and he said he’d use English if he traveled around India because he’s not very comfortable w/ Hindi (despite studying it in school), though he could use Hindi if he had to.

      Somehow the government holds things together. I guess people see themselves as Indian despite the extreme differences between regions. So I guess that’s something the Brits somehow got right, though they completely screwed up Pakistan (many Indians believe Pakistan and India should be the same country, despite their fierce rivalry).

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        From what I’ve heard about Modi it’s pretty much the opposite…

        It’s not a unified system where everyone gets along, it’s a rigid caste system (I think technically outlawed but not enforced) where people with power are ok with it because they’re not on the bottom, and the people on the bottom don’t have enough power to change anything.

        There’s a reasons Modi’s friends are trump, putin, and kim.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            But somehow Modi has a high approval rating,

            Because 50%+ of India that votes benefits from it…

            I think we’re just using different definitions of “hold things together”

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I thought Modi’s policies were generally bad for the populace at large. I haven’t been tracking it very well though, so I could be mistaken.

              Trump’s policies tend to be bad for the population at large (basically triggered the massive inflation we had), and so are Putin’s (triggered a ton of sanctions w/ his stupid war), so if his policies are anything like either of those two, then I would assume they’d be bad for average Indians.

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I thought Modi’s policies were generally bad for the populace at large

                But it gets worse the further down the ladder you go.

                trump will be bad for his white voters, but he’ll treat the people they view as below them even worse

                Some people compare themselves to others to judge their worth, so they’ll settle for less if others get nothing.