Its a sly joke. They have a right to your work. That’s why its called right to work.
Well if they named it honestly as “Right to Fire” then only 55% of voters would vote for it.
That’s a different thing entirely.
“Right to Work” is about the relationship between workers and unions. Specifically, it bans mandatory membership in unions and union-member-exclusive benefits. The most important part of that is it keeps unions from being able to collect union dues.
“At-will employment” is about the relationship between employer and employee, and is what allows someone to be fired for any non-protected reason or no reason at all. It’s also the standard almost everywhere and has little impact most places because firing someone without cause still incurs payment for unemployment benefits.
Trust me, as a former manager, it’s still very hard to get corporate permission to fire someone who shows up on time, sober, in dress code no matter how toxic or lazy they are.
That’s “at-will” though, isn’t it?
Never got why small government guys would support it where I lived. It’s just the government stepping in to limit the union on behalf of big corporations
Any conservative thing named after any form of the word “freedom” is always a scam to reduce freedom.
