• bassomitron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Man, that might happen for a high profile family/person. For average people in many places in the US, they’ll be lucky if the police even pay out to cover damages to property, nevermind anything else.

    Edit: and yes, I know this is just a green text and not a real story.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 days ago

      There are tons of examples counter to your claim.

      A lot of the settlements probably don’t even get reported on at the request of the city in question.

      • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        While true, your hypothesis doesn’t take into consideration how often the police fuck up.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          And you don’t seem to take into consideration how rarely people sue. A lot of open and shut cases aren’t pursued because the public doesn’t know they can.

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yeah, 10 million might be a stretch. But the city I used to work in would immediately settle for 250k for something like that. Lawyers are expensive, and losing is more expensive

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          10M was a stretch for sure, but a family in Jolliet recently got 2.9M USD for the police raiding the wrong house and quite a while back Dr. Lawrence Crosby got 1.25M USD for the police arresting him for the theft of his own car based on an anonymous tip.

          • Szyler@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Those are accidents vs the op which was not an accident. It was legit the right place and searching for the right thing. They had some evidence to do the search legally. So your comment and this hypothetical aren’t quite the same.

            • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              The judge and jury don’t know about the accident. The judge and jury will see that police raided an older couple’s house based on at most a stock photo, an anonymous tinder account, a photo of school laboratory from an unknown source (anon’s not even a real chemist), and an IP address which can be spoofed.

              In fact, they don’t even know anon is involved at all.