• PunnyName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    16 days ago

    Forgot to put the portion where Reps try and block every single fucking thing that Dems try to accomplish.

    Wanna know why abortion wasn’t enshrined into law when the Dems had the majority? Because they didn’t have a filibuster proof super majority for the handful of weeks they had all the power.

    We got the ACA instead.

    • pjwestin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      16 days ago

      They had the super majority at the start of that term. They couldn’t have pushed something as complicated as the ACA through, but they could have moved on something small like affirming Roe. Besides, the Republicans always find a way to ram through legislation without a super majority (and I’d suspect we’re about to see them abolish it entirely), but the Democrats never do.

      For example, when the Senate parliamentarian tells the Democrats that they can’t pass a $15 minimum wage through a simple majority, the Democrats give up. When the parliamentarian tells the Republicans they can’t do something, they ignore them, and one time, they just flat our fired the guy.

      You can argue about whether the Republicans are being unethical or underhanded, but at the end of the day, they achieve things, and the Democrats don’t. The Democrats will tell you that they need 60 votes to do anything and that the parliamentarian won’t allow them to pass non-budgetary items without one, but Senate filibuster rules can be changed, and the Parliamentarian has no real authority. Playing by the rules while your opponent cheats isn’t noble, it’s stupid.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        Yup the whole Republicans ignore the rules and Democrats don’t thing hurts extra hard when you watch Democrats throw the rules out the window to support a genocide.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          16 days ago

          Democrats very much followed the rules when supporting Israel’s settler-colonial genocide, that’s been a part of the rules since the settler-colonial project started.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            16 days ago

            No they didn’t. There are specific laws forbidding military aid to war criminals.

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              16 days ago

              Yes, and Israel has always been guilty of war crimes, genocide, and settler-colonialism. That’s its purpose.

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                16 days ago

                Yes but until now there’s been a veneer of legal occupation. That is gone and the Democrats doubled down after it was gone. After most people could clearly see the crimes being committed.

    • darthsid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      16 days ago

      I’m not buying this anymore. Dems could do the same if they had balls. Enough of this when they go low we go high bs.